Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hipsters


Must haves: so much fun and getting all the girls (or boys) that it makes lonely trolls angry


If you're going to give in to projecting your lack of self-esteem onto others, please make the effort to get your facts straight:


1) Beards are no longer hipster. They've passed the tipping point by some margin (Jesus, it was even on the Today programme that they ceased to be cool when all the non-cool kids started sporting them)


2) Not wearing a fleece doesn't make you a hipster. It makes you an individual with a modicum of self-respect (There is never any excuse for wearing a fleece unless polar exploring)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-741921
Share on other sites

Hipsters -


Must haves.


A first class honours in getting s*it faced in a s*ithole.


Getting the night bus home and being loud and posh whilst juggling a kebab or boxed chicken meal. Must be annoying on public transport.


A bad taste in vintage tops (preferably floral or ironic in some way). Tops with band names from the 70s seem popular too.


Never haves.


Never stay in a s*it area too long. No ones likes the p*sshead who hangs around on the streets at 6 in the morning, especially in a 'former' cool place. You're basically on a par with a park bench alcoholic if you do.


Never talk about yourself in terms of 'labels' - you won't have too many friends if you do.


Never laugh at something that's actually funny. It's the height of coolness. Keep a sarcastic face at all times.


Completely ignore everything I'm saying. But check out my sweater, cos it's dated ugly and from a long time ago, and you want it off me don't ya?


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-741926
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get yourself down to Dulwich Hamlet, there are a

> load of the annoying twats doing their best to

> ruin the matches.




You're wrong. I know who you're talking about. For a start, none of those people are rich, or even well off. None of them are posh. They're not slumming it which is pretty much what hipster is, appropriation. If you don't like singing, don't go to a football match.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-741937
Share on other sites

I just find it amusing that people can get still so narked by how some people dress and choose to live their lives in a certain style, that does no harm to anyone, get over it, good grief ... Ps I have no beard or any form of headwear, but would like some DM's as I loved wearing them in the 80's, but fear I'm a tad too over hill for them now ;)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-741951
Share on other sites

Personally, I find intolerance more annoying than "hipsters" ;-)


Yes, some folks can wind us up with their ways or appearance, but stereotyping a group is a great way to cause division. We're all in at least a few groups whether we think so or not, and we all wind others up in some way or another; even just by existing.


I try to focus on what I like in ED, not what winds me up... there's enough in the latter category to fill a novel.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-741963
Share on other sites

brain_opera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>If you don't like singing, don't go to a football match.


Even if it IS post-modern Gregorian chanting with a cynically lazy approach to the dative and ignorance of the ablative. Posh kids love footy too.*



*Play up Gentlemen!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-742021
Share on other sites

brain_opera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Get yourself down to Dulwich Hamlet, there are

> a

> > load of the annoying twats doing their best to

> > ruin the matches.

>

>

>

> You're wrong. I know who you're talking about.

> For a start, none of those people are rich, or

> even well off. None of them are posh. They're not

> slumming it which is pretty much what hipster is,

> appropriation. If you don't like singing, don't go

> to a football match.



I love singing at a footy match, I just dont like some of the singers in this case.


And does one have to be rich to be a hipster?


And how do you know whether any of them are rich / well off, or slumming it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-742044
Share on other sites

Hi Otta


People like you are the lifeblood of the Hamlet :-) Hope to meet you next season. I bet you have been going home and away supporting the Hamlet.


Unlike the Hipsters you speak of? I bet you have more fun going away singing your songs when they don't go :-)


What's your favourite song at Dulwich to sing? We can have sing song next year away from them.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-742049
Share on other sites

This post seriously embodies all that is cr*p about East Dulwich.


Some people with beards go to the football and sing, get over it.


I don't have a beard but seriously, come over and meet some of the gentlemen with beards, you might like them, then again I suspect you might only go to the one big game a year.


Down with singing and having a good time at a footy match I say.


Blokes with beards and a hat or tossers, I would rather stand with the beards.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-742057
Share on other sites

NewtwoED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If Hipsters are young, skinny, wearing specs

> and

> > skinny jeans

> >

> > What are the older guys sporting American

> > workwear, short hair, beards ,glasses, and

> packing

> > a few pounds called ?

>

> ..waist-sters?


If they happen to be gay that could make them bears, but not sure what the mainstream category would be. Normal middle age maybe?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43612-hipsters/#findComment-742110
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...