Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I actually think Liverpool will run up quite a few

> goals tomorrow - I've seen some positive signs

> recently that suggest we could be looking at 6 or

> 7 goals for the Reds against Hull. I'm going for a

> Torres hat-trick and at least one goal from Babel.


That's not bad 123. Please see betting matters where you are needed!

Tonight on MOTD I saw a Fernando Torres masterclass. (I know some lucky people saw it in person).


I thought Alan Hansen was wrong in saying how easy it was for Torres - great players make things look easy and that is what Torres did today. He really is a class apart.


I'm moving towards viewing Torres as the best striker ever to have played in the premiership. Although he has only been here a 2/3 years I now expect him, in time, to exceed the accomplishments of Henry, Ronaldo and Rooney etc.


His first touch is excellent and he dummys defenders to make space in a tight penalty box, in a way that makes it look easy. He scores headed goals, in short he has everything. Great great player.


People talk of Drogba being a class player, but Torres is a class apart when compared to Drogba, he is comfortbaly the best striker in the Premiership at the moment.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's like the Premiership's answer to Pavlov's dog

> - blow the whistle and he will score a goal.



Quids (doesn't like jokes)


Wasn't it a bell?


The dogs not Carlton



Mick Mac:

Yes it was a bell Quids, you know that. But we can adapt for humours sake.

There are certainly 5+ worse teams.


West Ham have also have 2 games in hand and played Spuds and Liverpool (both narrow losses)..and the loss at Wigan doesn't look so bad tonight! Plus Hull and Pompey look sunk already!


At the other end - Man U look the team to me this season.

I have now backed Arsenal, Liverpool (both big profits) and Chelsea (hedging). MU I'm exposed on, did not fancy them but they look good, if I hedge on them then best time to do that is when they next lose. So keeping an eye on things, as, if I get them covered I could be in a really good position.
I'm in profit (small) whoever wins with free bets on Arsenal, City, Spurs in ascending order of magnitude of returns! I've laid Burnely to be relegated and have Portsmouth to go down - a decent win but small profit if they stay up too thanks to an earlier trade. Happy days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...