Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok, ok...what is his strike rate? Must be

> impressive for sure



Torres has 46 goals in 64 premiership starts if he scores 4 against Chelsea! He will equal andy cole's record of fastest to fifty. Not bad for someone who doesn't take penalties

Only 73 points Quids - 7 down on last week, damn!


Someone actually had 74 (without Torres, who got me 34 pts) and looking at their team they still have Given and Barry to get them points tomorrow night!


Not seen Torres that composed in front of goal - looks like he has stepped up to a brand new level. Be interesting what Chelsea have in store next week (apart from kicking him) especially since Petr Cech is suspended.


Turned on Goals on Sunday this morning and to my surprise there was no Phil Brown sitting on the Sky sofa!

92 games, 58 goals


League: 46 in 64


I feel so priviliged to have him in our team and also to watch him week in week out. The best part is he totally gets Liverpool football club and comes across as being really down to earth.


The night we battered Real Madrid 4-0 at Anfield

http://awbroady.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/fernando-torres-liverpool-real-madrid-champio_19843561.jpg

Looking at the Champions League games this week none of them really ignite the imagination unless perhaps it's your own team. But if I had to pick out one clash as a potential thriller it would be Man United versus the German Champions Wolfsburg at Old Trafford on Wednesday. With United playing 3 days later against a confident Sunderland I suspect Fergie may put out a little bit of a squad / first team mix in CL and maybe, just maybe, could be a surprise result on the cards, and that is my big prediction of the week United to lose on Wednesday night!
Interesting article in the Times this morning naming 50 people to have "fouled" up football, among them Ian Wright, Rooney, the fake Ronaldo, Martin Edwards, George Best, Bill Shankly, El Tel, Mourhino, Cashley Hole, Drogaba among others. Interesting argument.

Steve Bruce fumming that Darren Bent decided to pass penalty duties to a team mate after he scored first penalty... what a tit blabbering to the press when he himself is too scared to watch actual penalties being taken. Maybe Bruce is trying to sound like a hard man with a trip to Old Trafford on Saturday where of course he'll show his usual bottle when deciding his tactics for the game... 'note to self must not upset uncle fergie or will not get reference for united job in 3 years time blah blah'.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sunderland/8277854.stm

In normal circumstances I would be right behind Eastenders to beat Citeh tonight, but recently any fondness I may have had for Zola et all has disappeared more quiclky than Ferguson after being asked by the BBC for an interview, thanks to the rantings of ten bob note.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With slightly less respect  I have  watched the 1 hour video - he said what he said and he did what he did. And his faux-wink wink “no violence people” fools no one but fools. Are you a fool?    the bbc told the truth - and it’s a straight up lie to say otherwise. Did they edit and cut to the chase to make a point? Absolutely  and correctly  he was not edited to say things he didn’t say  I cannot believe you watched the entire video and are trying to say the bbc edit somehow misrepresented what he said and Back in the real world - did the nutters who showed up at the white house materialise because of a bbc edit ffs - have some self respect and recognise what’s going on 
    • Friends and family in the 'States always say how wonderful it is to be in Britain and see our news coverage.  It's all partisan out there. The BBC manages to simultaneously p off the left and the right so must be doing something right.
    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...