Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just goes to show there are a lot of joyless

> > people out there.

>

> Perhaps instead of the noise, you should instead

> think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.

>

> This is nothing to do with being joyless.


Bar-B-Que's give off pollution and Carbon Monoxide..


Lets ban them as well.


The only reasonable reason to ban fireworks is that they can be dangerous and people get injured

especially when used in areas which are too small for some of the bigger fireworks

available these days. Perhaps there needs to be a limit on their size.


Its up to people to be sensible.


Not reasonable to ban them just because you don't like them.


They are used all over the world and millions of people love them.


There are those amongst us who do not like to see other people enjoying themselves.


Foxy

This isn't about BBQs, or smoking, which is also a pollutant.


Lots of people are not sensible with them, hence so many objections. They need to be limited, which they currently are not, except between certain hours of the early morning, which still doesn't stop people letting them off.


A proper exhibition on NYE or 5th November - no problem, go to it, don't go to it. It's the mindless setting off in back gardens, on the street or in parks that so many people are objecting to.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps instead of the noise, you should instead

> think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.




Do you drive?



Traffic makes loads of noise all year round, is terrible for the environment and kills loads of people each year.



Ban the cars!!!



And the bikes, ban the bloody bikes (because they basically turn otherwise lovely people in to complete weirdos. More mind altering than any drug).

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the

> mindless setting off in back gardens, on the

> street or in parks that so many people are

> objecting to.



Are you seriously lumping fireworks in the back garden in with setting them off in the parks and streets?


Really?


The noise may bug you, okay I can get that. And no one should be setting them off in the street / parks, I don't for a second disagree with you. But "mindless setting off in back gardens"? Have a word.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why don't you start a thread about cars and bikes?



Because I am not stupid enough to want them banned because I might find them mildly annoying at times.



Stick with being annoyed by the noise, I can understand that even if I disagree. But when you start talking about the harm they do to my lungs you've completely lost me.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mustard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps instead of the noise, you should

> instead

> > think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.

>

>

>

>

> Do you drive?

>

>

> Traffic makes loads of noise all year round, is

> terrible for the environment and kills loads of

> people each year.

>

>

> Ban the cars!!!

>

>

> And the bikes, ban the bloody bikes (because they

> basically turn otherwise lovely people in to

> complete weirdos. More mind altering than any

> drug).


The Whistlers back too - now he makes a noise worse than any firework


and he goes on and on and on.

That is additional info I posted, after first mate posted it elsewhere.


Idiots have spoiled fireworks for me, they aren't special anymore, just extremely noisy and worrisome for me and my dog, and other people feel the same. More were going off last night in close proximity.


I didn't start that petition, I provided the link to it. At the bottom it asks for limitations to be brought in in line with other countries, even though the heading says to ban them. At least it's started a debate. I was happy to find out other people felt the same as me.

Some people are responsible with them, but others are not. As with most things, the ones that aren't spoil it for the rest. They are noisy, disrupting sleep and waking the children. They're let off in areas where they shouldn't be. They pollute and cause mess that other people have to suffer. In the worst cases they can be dangerous and even kill.


So perhaps it would be better if - instead of people owning dogs at home - they were kept in an isolated compound and let out once or twice a year, under strictly controlled conditions - for dog lovers to enjoy.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like this - first mate posted it on the other

> thread -

>

> http://backcountryattitude.com/toxic_fireworks


That is truly (though inadvertently) hysterically funny. Here are some of their fabulous 'alternatives' for a spectacular fireworks display:


- Try watching the stars. (Wooooo!!!)

- Organizing community drum circles and drumming instead of lighting fireworks. (Ahhhhhhh!!)

- A stunt kite show at night with some LED's would be "cool". (Coooooolll!!)


I'm just surprised they didn't suggest "throw some lentils in the air".

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions for

> lonely elderly people.


Sorry - I'm not interested in trying to see things from any perspective other than the one that works best for me and others who happen to agree with me. Blinkers on. Forward march.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions for

> lonely elderly people.



I can't believe this was your response to *bob*'s post. I don't want to attack anyone, but that has got to be one of the most humourless posts in forum history.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mustard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> > assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions

> for

> > lonely elderly people.

>

>

> I can't believe this was your response to *bob*'s

> post. I don't want to attack anyone, but that has

> got to be one of the most humourless posts in

> forum history.


Irony alert!

I'm totally bored with the nightly fireworks too, but surely the existing laws on environmental health / noise / pollution / antisocial behaviour are enough for the Council to act if they get complaints? Banning them would just be criticised as more nanny state, and the injuries are unlikely to be high enough to make it a priority anyway, so I'm not convinced this is a realistic way to tackle the situation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was normal cyclists, in rush hour traffic, in the dark, in the rain. Just really want people to realise it’s that time of year even more careful and to get kitted out.
    • The other consideration is that users of Lime bikes and similar, plus younger pedal cyclists, probably don't view themselves as 'cyclists' as such and so don't get kitted out or even consider that they need to. I also agree that earlier nights are another factor for the casual or hire bike user more used to cycling in the summer. I don't think I have ever seen a hire bike or scooter user wearing a helmet or reflective gear- presumably that is because the bike is just viewed as a transport tool for short term use and users do not want to be encumbered by any of the safety gear? Before anyone jumps on me for anecdotal evidence and speculation, this is just what I have seen round here, there may be hordes of similar users elsewhere that are kitted out.
    • Well apolitical if that is an OK word for you.  Sorry if my choice of words was incorrect.  But on my original point if it wasn't for the Telegraph dragging this up, and yes they do have an agenda, an no they are not apolitical/impartial whatever, we;d be none the wiser. But as it made no difference to Trump's election campaign that why would he have a case in the American courts? Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the programme
    • If she took a bus, has she tried contacting the bus company? Long shot, but you never know!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...