Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just goes to show there are a lot of joyless

> > people out there.

>

> Perhaps instead of the noise, you should instead

> think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.

>

> This is nothing to do with being joyless.


Bar-B-Que's give off pollution and Carbon Monoxide..


Lets ban them as well.


The only reasonable reason to ban fireworks is that they can be dangerous and people get injured

especially when used in areas which are too small for some of the bigger fireworks

available these days. Perhaps there needs to be a limit on their size.


Its up to people to be sensible.


Not reasonable to ban them just because you don't like them.


They are used all over the world and millions of people love them.


There are those amongst us who do not like to see other people enjoying themselves.


Foxy

This isn't about BBQs, or smoking, which is also a pollutant.


Lots of people are not sensible with them, hence so many objections. They need to be limited, which they currently are not, except between certain hours of the early morning, which still doesn't stop people letting them off.


A proper exhibition on NYE or 5th November - no problem, go to it, don't go to it. It's the mindless setting off in back gardens, on the street or in parks that so many people are objecting to.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps instead of the noise, you should instead

> think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.




Do you drive?



Traffic makes loads of noise all year round, is terrible for the environment and kills loads of people each year.



Ban the cars!!!



And the bikes, ban the bloody bikes (because they basically turn otherwise lovely people in to complete weirdos. More mind altering than any drug).

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the

> mindless setting off in back gardens, on the

> street or in parks that so many people are

> objecting to.



Are you seriously lumping fireworks in the back garden in with setting them off in the parks and streets?


Really?


The noise may bug you, okay I can get that. And no one should be setting them off in the street / parks, I don't for a second disagree with you. But "mindless setting off in back gardens"? Have a word.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why don't you start a thread about cars and bikes?



Because I am not stupid enough to want them banned because I might find them mildly annoying at times.



Stick with being annoyed by the noise, I can understand that even if I disagree. But when you start talking about the harm they do to my lungs you've completely lost me.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mustard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps instead of the noise, you should

> instead

> > think of the pollution they cause to our lungs.

>

>

>

>

> Do you drive?

>

>

> Traffic makes loads of noise all year round, is

> terrible for the environment and kills loads of

> people each year.

>

>

> Ban the cars!!!

>

>

> And the bikes, ban the bloody bikes (because they

> basically turn otherwise lovely people in to

> complete weirdos. More mind altering than any

> drug).


The Whistlers back too - now he makes a noise worse than any firework


and he goes on and on and on.

That is additional info I posted, after first mate posted it elsewhere.


Idiots have spoiled fireworks for me, they aren't special anymore, just extremely noisy and worrisome for me and my dog, and other people feel the same. More were going off last night in close proximity.


I didn't start that petition, I provided the link to it. At the bottom it asks for limitations to be brought in in line with other countries, even though the heading says to ban them. At least it's started a debate. I was happy to find out other people felt the same as me.

Some people are responsible with them, but others are not. As with most things, the ones that aren't spoil it for the rest. They are noisy, disrupting sleep and waking the children. They're let off in areas where they shouldn't be. They pollute and cause mess that other people have to suffer. In the worst cases they can be dangerous and even kill.


So perhaps it would be better if - instead of people owning dogs at home - they were kept in an isolated compound and let out once or twice a year, under strictly controlled conditions - for dog lovers to enjoy.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like this - first mate posted it on the other

> thread -

>

> http://backcountryattitude.com/toxic_fireworks


That is truly (though inadvertently) hysterically funny. Here are some of their fabulous 'alternatives' for a spectacular fireworks display:


- Try watching the stars. (Wooooo!!!)

- Organizing community drum circles and drumming instead of lighting fireworks. (Ahhhhhhh!!)

- A stunt kite show at night with some LED's would be "cool". (Coooooolll!!)


I'm just surprised they didn't suggest "throw some lentils in the air".

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions for

> lonely elderly people.


Sorry - I'm not interested in trying to see things from any perspective other than the one that works best for me and others who happen to agree with me. Blinkers on. Forward march.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions for

> lonely elderly people.



I can't believe this was your response to *bob*'s post. I don't want to attack anyone, but that has got to be one of the most humourless posts in forum history.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mustard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sure, great idea, especially the guide dogs,

> > assistance dogs, therapy dogs, and companions

> for

> > lonely elderly people.

>

>

> I can't believe this was your response to *bob*'s

> post. I don't want to attack anyone, but that has

> got to be one of the most humourless posts in

> forum history.


Irony alert!

I'm totally bored with the nightly fireworks too, but surely the existing laws on environmental health / noise / pollution / antisocial behaviour are enough for the Council to act if they get complaints? Banning them would just be criticised as more nanny state, and the injuries are unlikely to be high enough to make it a priority anyway, so I'm not convinced this is a realistic way to tackle the situation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...