Jump to content

Recommended Posts

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The person has not been identified, so no.

>


The mere fact that the person has not been identified by name does not protect either the forum or the person making the statements - if sufficient information is given to cause people to suspect the identity of the person, that can be enough to found libel. "Blind vice" items in newspapers/gossip mags have been the subject of proceedings and substantial settlements.


More importantly IMHO, this is community website, run not for profit by Admin and his team. Several local businesses and individuals have threatened legal action (and even taken action in one case I think?) against them because of ill-judged and highly personal comments made in threads like this one - leading to other members having to offer free legal advice and a whole heap of further admin and trouble. This is going to sound horribly preachy (and I really wish it didn't) but is this really what the forum is here for?

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This individual has not had the chance to give me

> anything as I turned him down but I've since

> discovered that he's been with two local women I

> know and one of them now has health problems as a

> result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to

> harm people or he is just randy as hell and being

> reckless.


Or "loose" Women perhaps?!

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It seems I was wrong. There is not a Local

> shop-owning Lothario....there are several of them,

> all shagging wildly in and around LL. >:D<


That's all right then - so you aren't accusing someone of deliberately spreading a STD.

One of these trouser-dropping individuals has given a local woman a serious STD. Allegedly this man is very aggressive in his approach and has shagged several other local women recently, despite being married. He has tried it on with me but I did not succumb yet - and with what I now know, I will never succumb. It is not clear whether he is deliberately spreading his STD or whether he is just reckless as to who he gives it to. It is said he claims he no longer shags his wife (which may be true).


In the course of my 'investigatins' I have also stumbled across several other randy local shopkeepers who are also married and also shagging for England. Some local women are not able to even enter certain ED establishments unless accompanied by a male friend, otherwise there rogering shopkeepers will ooze into lecherous overdrive.


Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FelicityNormal Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It seems I was wrong. There is not a Local

> > shop-owning Lothario....there are several of

> them,

> > all shagging wildly in and around LL. >:D

> That's all right then - so you aren't accusing

> someone of deliberately spreading a STD.

Were any of these women raped? Did any of these women ask if the man was married? Did any of them insist on using a condom as obviously they did not know this man very well? If a woman shags a man about which she knows nothing or little, without using a condom, then she is taking a risk with her sexual health. 6 of one and half dozen of the other IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry to hear you are having issues. Fwiw, we received a regular letter this week. Maybe it's worth asking at the Dulwich delivery office (it's in West Dulwich, though. Their phone number is 03457740740) to see if there are aware of any issues in your particular area?  I've seen cases in the past were the a particular postie was sick and they didn't cover for them, they just let everything accumulate for a couple of days until the person was back.
    • Mal, it is related to this issue and if you scroll back a few pages you will see that Brockwell was brought up in relation to this (not by me I hasten to add). Do you not think it seems perfectly reasonable for people to be able to reference a neighbouring event - one that is having a number of challenges not too dissimilar to the ones Gala is having?     These sentences from the BrixtonBuzz article I linked seem very pertinent too:  The concern, they argue, is not just about permits, but about the Council’s repeated failure to follow proper planning processes and its habit of acting in the interests of commercial promoters rather than the local community.   And this: The group is now calling on residents to write to their local MP and councillors, accusing the Council of using legal mechanisms to avoid scrutiny.
    • Mal, like it or not, it does have some bearing on other councils. There was an item about it on Times Radio on Sunday - Kate Borsay, a presenter who lives locally, referenced Peckham Rye in relation to the Brockwell case. As the reporter pointed out, local councils will all be talking to each other and closely following how things unfold. If a precedent is set with Brockwell, other councils will be under greater scrutiny. 
    • Why don't you start a new thread about Brockwell Park?  I promise that I won't post on it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...