Jump to content

Moxtons fishmongers


george74

Recommended Posts

Hi all


I have a small catering business and use Moxons all the time. Their fish and service is always fantastic quality.


Over the Christmas period, fish stocks are usually quite low and lots of fishermen do not go out on their boats until after the new year. As such, there is usually a limited supply and for the most part, shell fish such as scallops and crabs are super limited.


If you want scallops etc - I am sure you could always get some of the deep frozen Peruvian ones that sainsburys stocks, but even then, Sainsburys sometimes runs out :)


Moxons are always really clear that if I need a particular type of fish for an event, I need to order in advance and if supply at the markets for this fish is a bit unstable due to weather conditions, they always inform me as soon as possible, suggesting suitable alternatives if possible.


As an alternative to scallops, can I suggest lobster for a bit of luxury NYE dining. Moxons have some fab frozen lobster tails and a little goes a long way...

I've used Moxons once and I can assure them I will not be returning. The service was hardly smiley and friendly, I seem to recall a chill in the air and it was not the ice keeping the lack of fish chilled either. The prices were on the high side, and comparable to Sopers of Nunhead they don't even come close in terms of service supply and price.


When someone is having a dinner party and has been queuing for circa 20 minutes, they hve every right to be a bit miffed. And judging by my experience here, the staff are not likely to offer an alternative fishmonger or fish alternative to replace said scallops. I'm with the poster above who mentioned a fish finger sandwich. When all else fails, pop to iceland and get a 25 pack of frozen fish fingers and a mothers pride loaf. Job done.


Louisa.

Glad to see there's life in the EDF yet. This thread is one of the funniest in ages. Could it win the 'first world problem of the EDF year' award, I wonder?


I adore Moxons. Their own smoked (in Wimbledon) salmon is fantastic and ridiculously good value, and they're usually friendly and helpful in my experience. I also have a thing for smoked haddock and theirs is way better than Sainsbury's or the guy on the Sunday market at Herne Hill.


Louisa, try smiling at them and let me know if anything changes. (Be the change you want to see in the world, as Gandhi said...)

RPC as a customer first impressions count. I do not criticise lightly. I left the shop feeling less than satisfied with the service and to be frank it's the only memory I now have of the place, even if the fish I voight was the best fish since the last supper It won't stick in my memory after receiving bad service. Also, with regards the smoked salmon, it all depends what you see as ridiculously good value? No, I go with my head when it comes to local shops. If the business is well established with a back catalogue of over a century (Sopers) I know I can rely on them. That's wheree my business will be heading in 2015, sorry Moxons!


Louisa.

It's amazing how poor service, unfriendly attitudes and shoddy produce always seem to land at the feet of the same old virtual faces on here, year after year, without fail, whilst so many others (myself included) seem to escape mostly untouched.


It's like they have some sort of built-in magnet that attracts the stuff.

smb12 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you want scallops etc - I am sure you could

> always get some of the deep frozen Peruvian ones

> that sainsburys stocks


I think if you're going for frozen scallops, the Chinese supermarkets are your best bet. A huge bag of very large frozen scallops will set you back ?15 or so. And they're perfectly good (even if they don't brown up as nicely as fresh ones).

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone welcome at our place tonight.

>

> I will shove one scallop or jumbo prawn (please

> provide preference) up your bum on each stroke of

> midnight - followed by Auld Lang Syne


Prep yourself *Bob*


I know where you live


If Louisa could turn up and "criticise lightly" then my year will be made


I'll start with the scallops, but could you finish with a shell on prawn, backwards ?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's amazing how poor service, unfriendly

> attitudes and shoddy produce always seem to land

> at the feet of the same old virtual faces on here,

> year after year, without fail, whilst so many

> others (myself included) seem to escape mostly

> untouched.

>

> It's like they have some sort of built-in magnet

> that attracts the stuff.


And why is it *Bob* that when someone has a difference of opinion to yourself you find the need

to get personal.

The OP had an unfortunate experience. I backed them up with my own experiences and then instead of just

posting about your experience, you decide to throw insults.. year after year, without fail.


DF

I've no idea what a scallop is but I'm enjoying the thread. When I were a lad my Dad brought back fresh trout and salmon after a days fishing. Perhaps George should take up fishing if a scallop is something you can catch.


PS I never liked fish or fishlike things that people eat.

I always shop at Moxons, have always received excellent service despite buying very small amounts (I'm the only fish eater in the house)

I must say I find it a bit pathetic going into a shop that sells FRESH produce and then having a strop and threatening a boycott on a local forum because they sold out of what you wanted.

Note to OP...Perhaps you should have got up earlier and joined the queue sooner rather than throw a hissy.

Also bear in mind that Moxon's being a relatively new 'blow-in' business


Then it's not suprising the comments they attract, from the usual suspects


And being a retailer of fresh/seasonal produce, I usually have a plan B when shopping there


Just in case like, y'now.....it's not available


But, if it's in a cookbook, then IT MUST BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES


NO MATTER WHAT

er, Fox, that is a photo of an illegal "Scollop" (sic)


rather like the mango fiasco, they were recently made illegal to sell like that.


not sure what the eurocrats had in mind: for me the best shellfish to eat is one that is tightly fighting for its life. No shell = fight is over. but we can no longer legally buy them inside their shells (!).


btw, even naked scallops are absolutely delicious from moxon's.

When I was a Yorkshire kid [now I'm an ED adult], a scollop was what you ordered at the fish shop [as opposed to the chip shop, the chippie, the fish and chip shop].

It was a thin piece of fish between two slices of potato, battered and deep fried. Cheaper than just ordering 'a fish', and with a scoop of 'bits'...all the leftover batter droppings, a staple supper for a growing Yorkshire lass.


Bring back the scollop, I say.

Jacqui5254 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I was a Yorkshire kid , a scollop was what

> you ordered at the fish shop .

> It was a thin piece of fish between two slices of

> potato, battered and deep fried. Cheaper than

> just ordering 'a fish', and with a scoop of

> 'bits'...all the leftover batter droppings, a

> staple supper for a growing Yorkshire lass.

>

> Bring back the scollop, I say.


In Brum where I grew up, there isn't even fish in it. Simply a large slice of potato (about 1cm thick) battered and deep-fried. Delicious! I still manage to get my hands on a few when I visit Brum.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In Brum where I grew up, there isn't even fish in it. Simply

> a large slice of potato (about 1cm thick) battered and deep-fried.


Same in Liverpool.


jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but we can no longer legally buy them inside their shells


You sure about that? We've bought them in shells fairly recently. Can't see anything online about this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...