Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw it going down Barry Road towards Peckham Rye

> at about 2.40. There were 2 bikes ahead of it with

> lights and sirens and a bike immediately in front


Would you believe, he's known as 'Easy Rider' !

Laur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sophie was in South London today...

>

> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2918370/

> A-birthday-treat-Sophie-Countess-Wessex-celebrates

> -50th-slice-cake-bunch-flowers-visit-centre-tropic

> al-diseases.html


Yep, she'd get it......

I tried to keep it as low key as possible, but it was me. I like to have my driver bring me back through East Dulwich to remind me why I moved out. Those Uber Range Rover Taxi driver don't half know how to charge. The Poice escort were just making sure I made it back to Broadmoor.

Saw them near Nags Head about 3.55 so they must have stopped off somewhere between Barry Rd at 2.40pm and 3.55. Dark Green armoured Range Rover screams minor royal but didn't think there were enough cars.



uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw it going down Barry Road towards Peckham Rye

> at about 2.40. There were 2 bikes ahead of it with

> lights and sirens and a bike immediately in front

> of it

There were two cars with outriders this morning. The first, a Range Rover with two out-riders passed through Dulwich Village towards the a205 at about 8.55 and was followed a few minutes later by another Range Rover with four out-riders.
They were at the Harvester at about 9.40. They had turned left out of Dulwich Common and the front motorcycle rider stopped all the traffic to allow the 4x4 to turn left......maybe the person has a child at Dulwich College and is being escorted back and forth! My son reckons we should not be posting these movements because there could be an attack on them!
Yep! Saw them at Nigel Road by Nags Head (on my way into the marvelous Lerryns coffee shop) this morning. Another customer said she'd seen them in Camberwell this morning. Got quite a good look in the Range Rover - no one in the back and two very ordinary looking blokes in the front, so yeah training sounds right. How disappointing!

KikiMac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep! Saw them at Nigel Road by Nags Head (on my

> way into the marvelous Lerryns coffee shop) this

> morning. Another customer said she'd seen them in

> Camberwell this morning. Got quite a good look in

> the Range Rover - no one in the back and two very

> ordinary looking blokes in the front, so yeah

> training sounds right. How disappointing!


Boohoo, i really was hoping for something exciting!

Here in Sarf London it would have been the Richardsons, not the Krays. For anyone too young to remember them (I.e. anyone in East Dulwich) they were an enterprising pair of businessmen from Camberwell. Known for their hands on approach to community affairs.
I saw it come through the Village I think it's a dry run for a royal or political visit, usually in the past to the Picture Gallery, I think they've all been there. Thats why they come through the Village and go back a different way to vary the route. But, interestingly (stop yawning at the back there please) they seem to do these things sometimes months in advance of the actual visit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...