Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(I think he means NOMBY).

I have been wearing ear plugs that shut out everything for several years now as I was woken at 4am and could not get back to sleep. I realised how bad it was when I actually slept right through the night with the windows open once...9/11- and there were no planes.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How so?


People are happy to go on holiday and fly around the World but don't want Planes flying overhead.


The problem in East Dulwich is much less of a problem than say in Staines and closer still to the Airport..


It's like people who drive and then complain about the traffic..


Ridiculous argument.


DulwichFox

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would people be interested in a public meeting

> about aircraft noise in Spetember?

> Please email if yes so we can see numbers.

> I'd anticipate asking HACAN, CAA, Heathrow and

> City airport along to discuss and explain.

Hi James - would be interested in coming along. Thanks in advance for organising.


HP

No really. Latest research shows business flying is going down - long term trend. People email, video and audio conference call.

The increase in air travel is largely a small number of high wealth individuals who are flying much more.


So no, the research does not support your thinking Dulwich Fox...this time.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwch fox.

> STFU please this is not about you and your weird

> logic.!


What weird logic.. WTF are you talking about.


Having lived under the flight path for 35 years I have no problem with aircraft..


DF

Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

The aircraft caused no problems.


The traffic however with constant Ambulances, Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of a disturbance.

Not to mention the 176 buses..


Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a

> pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

> The aircraft caused no problems.

>

> The traffic however with constant Ambulances,

> Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of

> a disturbance.

> Not to mention the 176 buses..

>

> Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.

>

> DulwichFox


You really need help. I fear even the Maudsley may be unable to treat you.


It'll try to explain again in the hope you are/have suffered some temporary form of madness.



If I was in my home playing loud music I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I lived in a noisy road with constant traffic I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I had a hearing problem I would not hear the aircraft noise.


If I hear the aircraft noise, I hear the aircraft noise.

If the aircraft noise irritates me it irritates me.

If the aircraft are there making a noise from 5am and they irritate me I am not you I am me.


If you still don't get it and still don't understand why your constant posting against those who have issue with the aircraft noise.


Maybe DF stands for Dumb Fu?ker .. ?

DF

As I?m feeling somewhat sorry for you, as you have been living a life where you are unaware of your thought processes.

I would like to help you understand your weird logic with the following simple example ?.



You? Have a headache. (Verging on a migraine)

I... Do not have a headache. (My mind is it total harmony with the universe)

I constantly inform YOU that YOU don?t have a headache... ?WHY?? because I do not have a headache?


In that simple example I have adopting your weird logic?


I hope this is an opportunity for you to understand your weird logic; it?s never too late for you to become a regular member of the human race and understand humanity. Possibly? I live in hope.




Sorry for being abusive in previous posts, I?m struggling with a lack of sleep due to the Aircraft noise starting at 4.45 am.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...