Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(I think he means NOMBY).

I have been wearing ear plugs that shut out everything for several years now as I was woken at 4am and could not get back to sleep. I realised how bad it was when I actually slept right through the night with the windows open once...9/11- and there were no planes.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How so?


People are happy to go on holiday and fly around the World but don't want Planes flying overhead.


The problem in East Dulwich is much less of a problem than say in Staines and closer still to the Airport..


It's like people who drive and then complain about the traffic..


Ridiculous argument.


DulwichFox

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would people be interested in a public meeting

> about aircraft noise in Spetember?

> Please email if yes so we can see numbers.

> I'd anticipate asking HACAN, CAA, Heathrow and

> City airport along to discuss and explain.

Hi James - would be interested in coming along. Thanks in advance for organising.


HP

No really. Latest research shows business flying is going down - long term trend. People email, video and audio conference call.

The increase in air travel is largely a small number of high wealth individuals who are flying much more.


So no, the research does not support your thinking Dulwich Fox...this time.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwch fox.

> STFU please this is not about you and your weird

> logic.!


What weird logic.. WTF are you talking about.


Having lived under the flight path for 35 years I have no problem with aircraft..


DF

Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

The aircraft caused no problems.


The traffic however with constant Ambulances, Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of a disturbance.

Not to mention the 176 buses..


Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a

> pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

> The aircraft caused no problems.

>

> The traffic however with constant Ambulances,

> Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of

> a disturbance.

> Not to mention the 176 buses..

>

> Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.

>

> DulwichFox


You really need help. I fear even the Maudsley may be unable to treat you.


It'll try to explain again in the hope you are/have suffered some temporary form of madness.



If I was in my home playing loud music I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I lived in a noisy road with constant traffic I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I had a hearing problem I would not hear the aircraft noise.


If I hear the aircraft noise, I hear the aircraft noise.

If the aircraft noise irritates me it irritates me.

If the aircraft are there making a noise from 5am and they irritate me I am not you I am me.


If you still don't get it and still don't understand why your constant posting against those who have issue with the aircraft noise.


Maybe DF stands for Dumb Fu?ker .. ?

DF

As I?m feeling somewhat sorry for you, as you have been living a life where you are unaware of your thought processes.

I would like to help you understand your weird logic with the following simple example ?.



You? Have a headache. (Verging on a migraine)

I... Do not have a headache. (My mind is it total harmony with the universe)

I constantly inform YOU that YOU don?t have a headache... ?WHY?? because I do not have a headache?


In that simple example I have adopting your weird logic?


I hope this is an opportunity for you to understand your weird logic; it?s never too late for you to become a regular member of the human race and understand humanity. Possibly? I live in hope.




Sorry for being abusive in previous posts, I?m struggling with a lack of sleep due to the Aircraft noise starting at 4.45 am.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a huge part of the problem.   Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country.    There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.
    • I heard today there was a burglary in Lacon Road yesterday evening between 20.00 - 22.00,  apparently the owners were home at the time & thieves got away with electrical items along with the owners car!  Wtf!   Anyone heard anything else?
    • What standing on the world stage? Starmer is a wannebe leader, no charisma, no passion, no leadership but tonnes of dithering, wringing his hands and pooing his pants.  I'd love to see Burnham give him a run for his money. Reason he became Mayor of Manchester was due to him no longer wanting to be in front line politics.  This thread has now gone well off topic, perhaps it needs renaming. Mandy and Keith's bathrobe Or, how Mandy stuck it to Starmer
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...