Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(I think he means NOMBY).

I have been wearing ear plugs that shut out everything for several years now as I was woken at 4am and could not get back to sleep. I realised how bad it was when I actually slept right through the night with the windows open once...9/11- and there were no planes.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How so?


People are happy to go on holiday and fly around the World but don't want Planes flying overhead.


The problem in East Dulwich is much less of a problem than say in Staines and closer still to the Airport..


It's like people who drive and then complain about the traffic..


Ridiculous argument.


DulwichFox

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would people be interested in a public meeting

> about aircraft noise in Spetember?

> Please email if yes so we can see numbers.

> I'd anticipate asking HACAN, CAA, Heathrow and

> City airport along to discuss and explain.

Hi James - would be interested in coming along. Thanks in advance for organising.


HP

No really. Latest research shows business flying is going down - long term trend. People email, video and audio conference call.

The increase in air travel is largely a small number of high wealth individuals who are flying much more.


So no, the research does not support your thinking Dulwich Fox...this time.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwch fox.

> STFU please this is not about you and your weird

> logic.!


What weird logic.. WTF are you talking about.


Having lived under the flight path for 35 years I have no problem with aircraft..


DF

Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

The aircraft caused no problems.


The traffic however with constant Ambulances, Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of a disturbance.

Not to mention the 176 buses..


Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funny.. A friend of mine and myself just spent a

> pleasant afternoon drinking on lordship lane.

> The aircraft caused no problems.

>

> The traffic however with constant Ambulances,

> Police sirens and a fire engine were MUCH more of

> a disturbance.

> Not to mention the 176 buses..

>

> Aircraft just do not fit into the equation.

>

> DulwichFox


You really need help. I fear even the Maudsley may be unable to treat you.


It'll try to explain again in the hope you are/have suffered some temporary form of madness.



If I was in my home playing loud music I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I lived in a noisy road with constant traffic I would not hear the aircraft noise.

If I had a hearing problem I would not hear the aircraft noise.


If I hear the aircraft noise, I hear the aircraft noise.

If the aircraft noise irritates me it irritates me.

If the aircraft are there making a noise from 5am and they irritate me I am not you I am me.


If you still don't get it and still don't understand why your constant posting against those who have issue with the aircraft noise.


Maybe DF stands for Dumb Fu?ker .. ?

DF

As I?m feeling somewhat sorry for you, as you have been living a life where you are unaware of your thought processes.

I would like to help you understand your weird logic with the following simple example ?.



You? Have a headache. (Verging on a migraine)

I... Do not have a headache. (My mind is it total harmony with the universe)

I constantly inform YOU that YOU don?t have a headache... ?WHY?? because I do not have a headache?


In that simple example I have adopting your weird logic?


I hope this is an opportunity for you to understand your weird logic; it?s never too late for you to become a regular member of the human race and understand humanity. Possibly? I live in hope.




Sorry for being abusive in previous posts, I?m struggling with a lack of sleep due to the Aircraft noise starting at 4.45 am.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not really since the first world war, and mainly in the sense then of 'getting a Blighty one' meaning a wound so serious you had to be sent home. I seriously doubt if one school child in 100 now would know what Blighty meant if the word was presented on its own with no context. 
    • 1 space available due to one of my clients moving.  Message me for more informations  🙂  
    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...