Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's quite fashionable to have a go at DulwichFox isn't it? You think you'll become more popular on the forum by doing so? You are wrong.


Or maybe you think it worked before with Louisa, keep it up and he'll leave too. Also wrong.


Foxy has got more sense than to take any notice of all the crap posts. He'll carry on giving advice, carry on being negative (as well as being occasionally positive!), carry on adding some humour and most people will enjoy reading his posts.

Granted, the forum would be quite dull if people didn't disagree with each other.

But I don't really understand starting a thread with an implied, then later stated, point of view, finding out that virtually no-one agrees with you, and then moaning that the EDF isn't representative of broader views in the area.

Did I miss something?

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DF, you habitually go after people and habitually

> get disproved. I'm no saint on this forum but your

> raison d'?tre here appears to be one of

> outsmarting, one which perpetually fails.



At least he's consistent tho

I'd rather see the street lined with aesthetically pleasing German cars than this heap of bike shed junk - why can't they just put in the docking stations like with the Boris bikes. The proposed bike shed design really is an eyesore, okay maybe it looks good on an allotment garden but on the street please, do me a favour!
Some people are lighter sleepers than others Jeremy, so yes people faffing around with bike locks, closing bike hanger door late at night or early morning is not a win-win situation for all neighbours whose bedrooms overlook the contraption. Now it all depends on how considerate the users of the bike shed are but what if they're the same bunch who don't give a damn about pedestrians on London Bridge each morning, are they going to give a hoot?

cathy p j Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We also received a document from Southwark council

> on Saturday, saying that there is a proposal for a

> cycle hangar to be installed in our road in

> Nunhead, almost outside our house, with the

> consequent loss of a parking space. The document

> refers to the council website for more

> information, but I can't find any further

> information about it there. If anyone can let me

> have more details, I would be very grateful.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Cathy


I think they take up half a (car) parking space and provide an additional 6 bike parking spaces.

And what if some one comes along with a pair of Bulk Croppers..


They will be off with 6 bikes in 5 mins.


Just attracts thieves..


Keep them safe in your house where they can be added to your home insurance for less than the hire charge.


It may me a little inconvenient but in the long run I think it's worth it.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And what if some one comes along with a pair of

> Bulk Croppers..

>

> They will be off with 6 bikes in 5 mins.

>

> Just attracts thieves..

>

> Keep them safe in your house where they can be

> added to your home insurance for less than the

> hire charge.

>

> It may me a little inconvenient but in the long

> run I think it's worth it.

>

> DulwichFox


you still lock your bike, even when it's parked inside the hanger.

Certainly, the aesthetics of the design could be improved, and probably will if the scheme is successful, but the idea remains sound. Is the opposition to the hangers based solely on aesthetic grounds? As previously stated it's unlikely that the designers would have overlooked a dampening mechanism on the gate, so noise is unlikely to be an issue.


It also seems to me irrelevant if the cycle hangers take up a parking space, or if that space is regained due to resulting increased bike/reduced car use. If a motorist owns two or more vehicles they can (and will) park them on the street. If a cyclist owns two or more bikes and wishes to keep one secured in a hanger, they can.



BTW, a quick glance anywhere around ED will prove that the streets are hardly lined exclusively with beautifully designed German cars!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This should fit in on Goose Green..

> Would solve all East Dulwich Parking Probs..

> Create revenue and plenty of space for cycles

> too.

>

> .. And near the station. and all the shops and

> restaurants..

>

> http://www.graysshoppingcentre.co.uk/wp-content/up

> loads/2011/07/car-park.jpg

>

> Foxy Solving problems..


A slightly better alternative for Goose Green

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24960489

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> ----

> "but it is somehow assumed

> that the rest of us are doing cartwheels over the

> idea of these pieces of metal junk lining our

> streets"

>

>

> Such as cars, for example?



:)) :)) :))

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Keep them safe in your house where they can be

> added to your home insurance for less than the

> hire charge.

>

> It may me a little inconvenient but in the long

> run I think it's worth it.

>



They can be added to your home insurance whether or not you keep them in the house.


And it's not "a little inconvenient" to keep them in the house, it's bloody inconvenient, unless you have a large hall and/or a way to your garden (assuming you have a garden) which doesn't involve lugging the bike, possibly wet and muddy, all through your house to get there.

I like the idea but this design, as well as looking like shit, gives the impression that a couple of enterprising chaps with a small kangol (or angle grinder) and a truck could half-inch a fully laden one in a few minutes.


They wouldn't even need the aid of a work-experience kid underneath to lift the wheels of the chained bikes, just secure the lid, flip upside down and *Bob*s your uncle; bikes in a basket.


To go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...