Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have noticed that I very often find myself saying "what Jeremy said", to the point that I hope I'm not freaking him out. I have met Jeremy a few times in "the real world", so I am glad I am agreeing with someone who actually is a nice fella with a brain.


This is not to say I agree with everything Jeremy says, but often do.


Who on here do you most often find yourself agreeing with / puts what you're thinking a lot more eloquently than you have?


Of course Louisa is another one I tend to follow like a blind sheep.



Edited because there were about 5 typos!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5772-who-talks-sense/
Share on other sites

The city is not run by top hatted effete public schoolboys, but By streetwise Essex men & women, mixed with rugby playing toffs & thick necked guttaral colonials - not a group you really want to take on


What snorky said, boy talk's sense more often than not, you just sometimes have to apply the snorkyfilter

Sean bless him is one of my favs, he talks a lot of crap as well as a lot of sense but I love him for it nontheless.


Keef always talks sense and stands his ground so have to respect that.


*Bob* makes me giggle plus is possibly one of the most attractive gentlemen I have yet to feast my eyes on.


Whilst we are on this, can someone open a thread about who talks the most bull? (tempts fate)


Louisa.

Anyone who informs me that Johannesburg is in South Africa is all right with me so Brendan.(tu)


Brendan Yesterday, 10:57PM

Johannesburg to Benoni (these places are in South Africa) in 15minutes, the journey at normal speeds normally takes at least 30minutes.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's a big "almost" tere Strawbs ;-) I now want

> to know when Brendan hasn't talked sense!!!


HE HE.. Unfortunately I cant agree with B on corporal punishment so alas I couldnt say ALWAYS i had to say ALMOST... Thankfully B and I wont be having babies together so its not a deal breaker for our friendship!

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone who informs me that Johannesburg is in

> South Africa is all right with me so Brendan.(tu)


Only a few days ago I had to explain to a posh public school boy type I work with who is doing his masters in politics, where Durban is. So I though I best not make assumptions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...