Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Today programme every morning in the bathroom and breakfast.

Five live sport coverage, Newsnight, Question Time, Family Guy, Being Human, Saturday Swap Shop (I turned over to tiswas when my parents were't around though). Oh I don't know, I could go on for about 30 forum pages on my own about the value that the beeb has given the world over the years, and though it has dumbed down a bit, and never recovered from birtspeak, still is absolutely worth the money.


Should the licence be shared out a bit? Perhaps, but only if in saving ITV it promises to occasionally do something worthwhile.

EastEnders, if ever there was a reason to cut your own throat, The Beeb has a lot to offer but there are quite a few negatives, I personally like current affairs so the BBC news channel gets my vote but Bill Turnball is a hideous boor on the BBC breakfast show if ever there was one, the license fee is a bit steep thou'.

Yep, for the practicality of the iPlayer alone, i'm happy to pay the stealth tax. It's a pity that even now they have a fair number of clock watching under-employed staff at TVC. And i should know, i used to be one of them before my obscene pay-off :-$


Another topic for another post methinks....

I hate that the BBC uses the news to advertise its own programmes.

I hate that the BBC news presenters smile too much at the camera/us specially 6.00 news.

I hate the way one can sort of feel the producers bosses telling them to dumb down and be appealing.


I love that BBC was brave enough to broadcast Jerry Springfield musical.

I love that BBC still broadcasts people with opinions and personality and character that divides people (like J Clarkson, and I love him).


But as far as licence fee is concerned, I think it is value for money, the question should be is there an alternative to paying for it. The only way one can watch television at all, let alone the BBC, now, without a licence is by watching all its programmes via iplayer on computers and ditch the telly altogether.


It's a massive question. I don't have the answers. But of the question of the topic I would answer: just about.

yes charlie my friend but the point being that the bbc could still provide the iplayer and bbc news for about 31p a week from every person in the country with a TV, i could then top that up with a few other bits i want and be left with 8 quid a month to spend somewhere else. If you are to have such a debate then you need to set your bar slightly higher, you would also need to think about the things that you do not know about, things that if you did would make you react in the same way as say an MP claiming for firelighters and paint from farrow and ball !

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I say it is. Between TV and Radio I would say I'm

> happy to pay my fee. What do you say?

>

> PS There's a lot of prime time stuff I just can't

> watch but mostly it's very good.


Can't possibly disagree with you on this one, Bertie.


See you at The Drones.



hhhhmmmm.... tricky


not quite sure where to start looking for these "things" I don't know about, that I clearly should know about, when I don't know what those illusive things might be


should I start by looking into the "TV i" that you mention above?

possibly some new form of technology that I should know about???

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I say it is. Between TV and Radio I would say

> I'm

> > happy to pay my fee. What do you say?

> >

> > PS There's a lot of prime time stuff I just

> can't

> > watch but mostly it's very good.

>

> Can't possibly disagree with you on this one,

> Bertie.

>

> See you at The Drones.


Do Bertie and I have something in common?

[quote name=golden handshakes' date=' 1st class flights, deals in Michelin starred restaurants, massively self inflated wages, back handers, comfortable, unaccountable and completely arrogant.

]



that somehow also reminds me of the square mile, politicians, large commercial corporations, locally authority planning deptartments...etc.etc.


but I still like iplayer

(or is that ipayer)?

Absolutely.


You can never really know the true value of something until you see the alternative, and I consider myself something of an aficionado of global telly.


The BBC is an extraordinary achievement in terms of programming, costs less than a third of Sky, who make none.


The only organisation globally that come close to the BBC in terms of quality is HBO, but you'd have to say they're a one-trick pony.

The true test of whether it is value for money is to attempt to sell it's services into the market to compete with Sky and co.

Sky packages are much better value if you compare how long one is tuned in to which channels.

Since I moved to Sky the beeb are way down the field and I use it less and less.

I find it appalling that we do not have the choice to invest, or not, with the Beeb.

Possibly, depends what channels you watch.


Do remember that Sky does very little investment in original programming. It pays a fraction of production costs to TV studios who recoup overall expenses by syndicating the programmes globally.


The only studios big enough to do this are American. If you left TV to the likes of Sky and Setanta, then you might as well be living in the US, you'll see no different.


The BBC does great original programming: drama, documentary and news gathering. The BBC's natural history output is quite simply the best in the world. America doesn't do natural history programmes because of religious issues. No BBC, no education.

I agree Huguenot the beeb does produce wonderful stuff, sadly they do not harbour talent in high enough percentages.


They seemingly prefer to house managers, administrators, and accountants, rather than creative talent.


They do not help themselves to the best of their ability either, it would not cost much to have a +1hour or a +2hour on bbc1 and bbc2 hence doubling your channels for minimum outlay.

On the whole, I think yes it is. However I,m also totally sick of the beeb's self promotion of three programmes that I absolutely 'kin hate. The Apprentice, Strictly Toss and Dr Who. You'd think Russell T Davies was beatified or sumfink. ( what does the "T" stand for, oh wait don't answer that)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...