Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Right I know that sadly there are a few on this forum who read the Guardian but what do the rest of you read. I personally read the Metro and like to wind down on a Sunday afternoon with a copy of the Sunday Times. If Mrs Mills were to be made Prime minister this country would be a far better place not to mention more fun.


Ps. Have any of you thought Dulwichmum is behind Mrs Mills?


Mikecg and ????. We all know you read the Sun so there's no need to comment. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5957-what-do-you-pick-up/
Share on other sites

Sunday Times: 1975-85 until I realised that I could not warrant the cost and time reading all the Supplements, so I gave it up.


Also I took much more interest in my own life rather than trying to read and think tooseriously about all the World's ills, so I adopted a much lighter approach.


Now I don't buy any papers after receiving a paper bill for over a ?100 five years ago and realising I was only browsing. I read on-line now.

I agree that most of the broadsheets are politically affiliated in some way and therefore like political parties can?t really be taken seriously.


But the Metro actually being considered as some kind of paper?


Seriously?


I read it about once a week when I need a distraction on the train and it really takes journalism to a whole new level of shit. A level that has only been matched since the Lite and London Paper were spawned from the cesspit of ad-money hungry newsprint pulp.

Any newspaper every day. Invariably includes The Times, The Telegraph and the Evening Standard. Will often encompass The Guardian and the Independent. Maybe once a month I'll see the Sun and glance at The Mail - mostly to remind myself why I usually stick with the broadsheets. Metro / London Lite are only read in extremis when I have absolutely nothing else to read (including the back of my bus / rail ticket).


On rainy Sunday's over a long brunch a good day would include selective reading of Sunday TImes, Sunday Telegraph and Observer + a scandal rag or two (NOW or People) .

The SUnday Times, and quite right BBW Mrs Mills for PM. Isn't Mrs M AA Gill? No matter, he'd still do as PM for me.

I utterly despise the giveaways, at best a watered-down version of the parent paper and equally at best a source of litter.

Unless you're homeless, why bother?

A Guardian or an Independent for long train journeys - otherwise the Today programme in the morning and a snoot around the BBC/Guardian/Independent/Telegraph websites during the day. And The Onion, of course (finest hour: Onion link)


In a previous job I had to do press cuttings which involved skimming all the broadsheets every day. Being paid to read the papers sounds fun in principle but it's chuffing tedious after a few days. Plus you practically need Swarfega to get your hands clean afterwards.

I used to read half a dozen newspapers a day until about a decade ago. I wouldn't wipe my arse on any of Murdoch's rags but always get the Cindy (Independent On Sunday) and during the week I read the Daily Mirror because it's part of my job and I'll browse through The Independent and The Guardian if I have the time.

If you want the tumbleweed effect at the forum drinks just try and tell someone you DONT read the socially acceptable "right on" Guardian. Once they have got over their initial hoprrified shock offer to buy them a drink to counter balance their immediate assertion that you are some kind of fascist right wing scum bag and not just a nice well balanced chap with moderate political views who just happens to shamelessly enjoy:


- FT Weekend (every week)

- News of the World

- Observer / Sunday Times (I like both and yes this is allowed)

- GQ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...