Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hidden

Edit: Just received (noon, 1/12/06), a telephone call from a GBK representative - I'd sent GBK a separate e-mail saying that I hadn't had so good a meal as I'd hoped for, and outlining my dissatisfactions.


The representative: Indeed the burgers are centrally prepared (see below), although not frozen; and it is the uncertainties of handling between a butcher-of-origin and a restaurant kitchen that preclude cooking one's burger anything redder than "medium rare". -- Alex K


--


Last evening's visit to Gourmet Burger Kitchen on Lordship Lane in East Dulwich - a disappointment.


The buns, the toppings - first-rate. But the burger...


I asked for mine to be done very rare. "We can't, sir," I was told. "Health and safety."


This was a bad sign. "We can't vouch that our beef is recently prepared or cleanly handled. We suspect" (or worse, know) "that it's riddled with filth that must be burnt out of it."


A proper "gourmet kitchen" should be able to serve hamburger meat prepared to the same cleanliness and freshness standards as steak tartare!


And indeed, the texture of the pinkish burger, when it arrived, was no different from that of what one is served at McDonald's. The meat was over-ground and too compacted.


I suspect that it was prepared at a central facility, frozen, and shipped out to the franchised GBK outlets - necessary for "quality control" and absolute death to fresh-cooked REAL quality.


That's why, for me, chain franchises are bad news, and why my partner and I will be heading back to the Sea Cow for our next evening out at dinner on Lordship Lane.

Hidden

Not the "evil franchise" crap again! So its just franchise/chains that are crap? Explain why when I went to Liquorish last night my burger bun was so stale that I thought I was chewing a squash ball and my burger tasted rancid? Why did they serve a piece of white toast advertised as "crostini"? Is that chin ponce or independent ponce?

By the way I hate to shatter your illusions but the seacow is a chain! Muppet!

Hidden

Well, Steve, you made me laugh. No, of course any independent restaurant can serve bad food, and your evening at Liquorish illustrates that point.


Chain restaurants with central-facility food preparation use such a facility to foreclose any DOWNWARD variation in the "quality" of the standardised product. That central-facility food preparation also forecloses UPWARD variation in that "quality", however. GBK can't vary its burger preparation to let me have a rare burger.


Franchised chain restaurants with individual-facility food preparation, like the Sea Cow, let you order your food as you might like it cooked. If I want my - how about tuna? - just off sashimi, I can get what I want at the Sea Cow. No chance of that at Harry Ramsden's.


Can we agree that the point of difference may be the site of food preparation? I hope so. Can we agree that chain restaurants are more likely to prepare food at central locations than are independently owned restaurants? Again, I hope so.

Hidden
I went to GBK on Saturday for the first time and I thought the burgers were fantastic. But my gripe is that you have to go up to the counter to order and pay for your food and then pay for every drink you have as you order it. And as there were 10 of us it was a real hassle. So it's basically a fast food restaurant but charging regular restaurant prices. So not somewhere to go to for the dining experience. Plus no puddings!
  • 3 months later...
Hidden
What surprises me about GBK is the completely soulless nature of the staff. As might be expected the staff appear to be young East European women who, unfortunately appear to be completely devoid of personality. Young East European women can have personality and humour - just look at the girls in Mon Petit Chou!
Hidden
I agree with most of the above, but I also find these places extremely cramped. There's hardly room to swing a cat in there and even out on the "terrace" I see they've managed to squeeze in 5 tables - great for eavesdropping maybe, but not if you like a quiet and confidential conversation with your loved one.
Hidden

If you like burgers, you wouldn't go to GBK. If you like value for money you wouldn't go to GBK. If you like to eat in a warm and comfortable environment with friendly service you wouldn't eat in GBK. I'd never go back there ..... once was enough.


I've a burger lover it has to be said and for my money you simply cannot beat the burgers at the Magdala (unless I'm kaing them myself from William Rose mince) - no vested interest in Magdala, I simply know what I like.... I've even tried to find out from the chef what she puts in them .. but to no avail! :(

Hidden
Just for the record the burgers in the Bishop are fantastic, probably the best around. Each one freshly made from minced fillets of beef, so you can have it cooked rare. If a 'Gourmet' burger place informed me they couldn't cook a burger rare then i'd be a little confused as to why they call themselves a gourmet kitchen? (Apart from the obvious marketing reasons...)
Hidden

Hach? in Camden is the best I've witnessed. I realise it's a bit of a trek for those fortunate enough not to work there, but next time you take your teens to buy a pair of Doc Martins, it's well worth a pop in on Inverness St.


http://www.londontown.com/LondonInformation/Restaurant/Hach/d525/

Hidden

And at the Bishop you can actually have a rare burger?! Yowza! I'll give them both a try.


We rolled out the gas grill (oh, shush, we walk to work, our bit of backyard cookery is a carbon toeprint, no more) Friday afternoon and did just what BENJAMINTY recommends: Our own burgers, just off tartare, with William Rose mince. Heaven.

  • 7 months later...
Hidden

It's still the best of the 'good-for-you' burger joints, and infinitely better than McD's or BK in terms of quality and brand. Maybe it's just the way this particular franchise is run, if the Clapham one is still keeping up standards. Not being able to offer rare burgers does suggest that the patties are prepared off-site however.


Time for Wm Rose's to set one up.


Hnd home made are the best, as Keef says. Nice with a bit of ginger, red onion and coriander mixed in. Yum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...