Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hidden

Edit: Just received (noon, 1/12/06), a telephone call from a GBK representative - I'd sent GBK a separate e-mail saying that I hadn't had so good a meal as I'd hoped for, and outlining my dissatisfactions.


The representative: Indeed the burgers are centrally prepared (see below), although not frozen; and it is the uncertainties of handling between a butcher-of-origin and a restaurant kitchen that preclude cooking one's burger anything redder than "medium rare". -- Alex K


--


Last evening's visit to Gourmet Burger Kitchen on Lordship Lane in East Dulwich - a disappointment.


The buns, the toppings - first-rate. But the burger...


I asked for mine to be done very rare. "We can't, sir," I was told. "Health and safety."


This was a bad sign. "We can't vouch that our beef is recently prepared or cleanly handled. We suspect" (or worse, know) "that it's riddled with filth that must be burnt out of it."


A proper "gourmet kitchen" should be able to serve hamburger meat prepared to the same cleanliness and freshness standards as steak tartare!


And indeed, the texture of the pinkish burger, when it arrived, was no different from that of what one is served at McDonald's. The meat was over-ground and too compacted.


I suspect that it was prepared at a central facility, frozen, and shipped out to the franchised GBK outlets - necessary for "quality control" and absolute death to fresh-cooked REAL quality.


That's why, for me, chain franchises are bad news, and why my partner and I will be heading back to the Sea Cow for our next evening out at dinner on Lordship Lane.

Hidden

Not the "evil franchise" crap again! So its just franchise/chains that are crap? Explain why when I went to Liquorish last night my burger bun was so stale that I thought I was chewing a squash ball and my burger tasted rancid? Why did they serve a piece of white toast advertised as "crostini"? Is that chin ponce or independent ponce?

By the way I hate to shatter your illusions but the seacow is a chain! Muppet!

Hidden

Well, Steve, you made me laugh. No, of course any independent restaurant can serve bad food, and your evening at Liquorish illustrates that point.


Chain restaurants with central-facility food preparation use such a facility to foreclose any DOWNWARD variation in the "quality" of the standardised product. That central-facility food preparation also forecloses UPWARD variation in that "quality", however. GBK can't vary its burger preparation to let me have a rare burger.


Franchised chain restaurants with individual-facility food preparation, like the Sea Cow, let you order your food as you might like it cooked. If I want my - how about tuna? - just off sashimi, I can get what I want at the Sea Cow. No chance of that at Harry Ramsden's.


Can we agree that the point of difference may be the site of food preparation? I hope so. Can we agree that chain restaurants are more likely to prepare food at central locations than are independently owned restaurants? Again, I hope so.

Hidden
I went to GBK on Saturday for the first time and I thought the burgers were fantastic. But my gripe is that you have to go up to the counter to order and pay for your food and then pay for every drink you have as you order it. And as there were 10 of us it was a real hassle. So it's basically a fast food restaurant but charging regular restaurant prices. So not somewhere to go to for the dining experience. Plus no puddings!
  • 3 months later...
Hidden
What surprises me about GBK is the completely soulless nature of the staff. As might be expected the staff appear to be young East European women who, unfortunately appear to be completely devoid of personality. Young East European women can have personality and humour - just look at the girls in Mon Petit Chou!
Hidden
I agree with most of the above, but I also find these places extremely cramped. There's hardly room to swing a cat in there and even out on the "terrace" I see they've managed to squeeze in 5 tables - great for eavesdropping maybe, but not if you like a quiet and confidential conversation with your loved one.
Hidden

If you like burgers, you wouldn't go to GBK. If you like value for money you wouldn't go to GBK. If you like to eat in a warm and comfortable environment with friendly service you wouldn't eat in GBK. I'd never go back there ..... once was enough.


I've a burger lover it has to be said and for my money you simply cannot beat the burgers at the Magdala (unless I'm kaing them myself from William Rose mince) - no vested interest in Magdala, I simply know what I like.... I've even tried to find out from the chef what she puts in them .. but to no avail! :(

Hidden
Just for the record the burgers in the Bishop are fantastic, probably the best around. Each one freshly made from minced fillets of beef, so you can have it cooked rare. If a 'Gourmet' burger place informed me they couldn't cook a burger rare then i'd be a little confused as to why they call themselves a gourmet kitchen? (Apart from the obvious marketing reasons...)
Hidden

Hach? in Camden is the best I've witnessed. I realise it's a bit of a trek for those fortunate enough not to work there, but next time you take your teens to buy a pair of Doc Martins, it's well worth a pop in on Inverness St.


http://www.londontown.com/LondonInformation/Restaurant/Hach/d525/

Hidden

And at the Bishop you can actually have a rare burger?! Yowza! I'll give them both a try.


We rolled out the gas grill (oh, shush, we walk to work, our bit of backyard cookery is a carbon toeprint, no more) Friday afternoon and did just what BENJAMINTY recommends: Our own burgers, just off tartare, with William Rose mince. Heaven.

  • 7 months later...
Hidden

It's still the best of the 'good-for-you' burger joints, and infinitely better than McD's or BK in terms of quality and brand. Maybe it's just the way this particular franchise is run, if the Clapham one is still keeping up standards. Not being able to offer rare burgers does suggest that the patties are prepared off-site however.


Time for Wm Rose's to set one up.


Hnd home made are the best, as Keef says. Nice with a bit of ginger, red onion and coriander mixed in. Yum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...