Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What a bizarre and antiquated idea - that men should need a different sort of hairdresser or fear compromising their delicate masculinity. What next - the return of separate withdrawing rooms for men and women?


Why not go to a decent (unisex) hairdresser where they actually know how to style your hair to suit the shape of your face?

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a bizarre and antiquated idea - that men

> should need a different sort of hairdresser or

> fear compromising their delicate masculinity. What

> next - the return of separate withdrawing rooms

> for men and women?


I expressed a similar sentiment when using the ladies changing rooms at the country club but alas I fear the world is just not ready for those as progressive as you and I James.

Anyone paying more than ?5.50 for a dry cut or ?11 for a wet cut 'n' style is only doing so to tell themselves they are better than the rest of us. All haircuts are exactly the same, you are only paying more for the sense of superiority. My uncle cut hair for years and he told me this so I know what I'm talking about.
You men are so lucky you get beer and don't expect to pay more than ?11 for a wet cut. Incrdible. I find going to the hairdressers hurrendous. Your hairdresser feels obliged to make small talk, you are plonked in front of a mirror so are forced to read womans own (my personal opinion, no disrespect to the magazine)or something equally unappealing and pay a fortune. I am very unprecious when it comes to my hair so quite often after a glass of wine reach for the scissor with mixed results but it grows eventually. I've tried those free training places before and once spent 2 hrs 45 mins having a trim and i left before it was properly finished because i was so bored and hungry. I'm jelous and now considering a sex change.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for your reply. I have sent you a PM.  
    • It required legislation to identify the beneficial owners of properties in the UK held by overseas companies - and these still haven't been properly disclosed - ownership of things isn't just a google search away - and to suggest otherwise is not to understand how capitalism works. Unless you (cyclemonkey) do have access to that knowledge and would like to share.
    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...