Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I see the black couple all the time on Lordship Lane, very often around the Goose Green area and I must admit they were the first ones who came to mind and like others have said, completely harmless.


I also remember well the White Woman. She was definately under the care of the Maudsley ( but not necessarily as an in patient) had this information on very reliable sources. She did literally paint her face with white emulsion. Haven't seen her for many years but hope she's well where-ever she is.


I've never seen the whistling man. Is he still around?

Hehe -- I've inadvertently met the Black couple in Cheners -- I'd recently moved here and they came into the shop pretending to look for books. At one point they stood close to where I was browsing, kinda looking at me to see 'how to look for books'... they left soon after! Very sweet, but a bit odd
More of a Peckham character than an EDC, but there's the bloke that gets on the bus at peckham rye with his bird (actual, not misogynistic). He has a chain from it's foot to his wrist, but it sits on his hand, quietly and unflapping. Something of a double-take moment the first time I saw him...

Lets not forget that EDF does not exist in a vacumn. Some of these "characters" described on this thread will have family/friends/other loved ones who may read or even contribute to this forum.


To find out one is being discussed on an Internet forum could indeed feed into an already fragile delusional belief system... So when these "characters" relapse, their paranoia and sense of persecution, that people "are talking about me", is now shown to be true.


Be a little bit more respectful. Just because a "character" is no longer so high profile or visible, does not mean they are not still living locally and possibly may come across this forum.


Just my thoughts on the topic!

Come Come..lets get REAL here Guys...you cannae have it both ways......I moved to a lovely area, just like EAst Dulwich and, sadly, left all The Walworth Road Characters behind me....almost by definition they are from Working-Class stock...


In Walworth I could name squillions or maybe just zillions but in safe, family-orientated Bexley-not one in 26 years...


There was Archie, an alcoholic who wore a McDonalds hat, at all times, and abused passrs-by, like me on two seperate occassions.


Once when I was using the local phone box he walked past, opened the door and shouted "f+++ing yapping" right in my face b4 slamming the doorand making off.

Then we me and my M8 walked past him on the way to The Thomas A'Beckett to see Blunderbuss we greeted him only for him to reply "F++k the pleasantries!"...:))


Its like watching a Rough and Ready Football Club like Millwall the characters are 10-a-Penny, though not all desirable!


Go to a more pleasant environment and most people, naturally, conform, hence a dearth of characters.


I've learnt that you can't have your cake and eat it..B)

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can it be amended from Whistler, sophiesofa to

> Hummer, sophiesofa (i don't often smell bad

> though).


I must admit that whenever I see your moniker the inner voice reads it as Sophie? So far! accompanied by an elegant Gallic shrug*. I don't really know what that says about you. Or me.


*not a cardigan. Although, why not?

There is the bloke with the perfect Barnet who works in Sean's DIY (or is it Terry's? or mine?).


A maginificent combed-back and lacquered hair-do that hasnt changed, or indeed moved, for decades. Often to be seen outside the local caff with a big mug of something steamy and a fag on. Also to be seen in local boozers, sometimes wearing a slighlty too small suit.

The couple mentioned in other posts are by far my favourite ED characters. Many a time I've been in a shop on LL to have the old man simply walk in, say a cheery hello to everyone, and leave. I love the fact that the shopkeepers on LL seem to know him, and always respond with a smile and a wave. Harmless, friendly, and I bet they have a few great stories to tell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...