Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nope, definitely Crystal Waters and definitely dreadful. 'Rockstar' by Nickelback springs to mind as a recent hateful song demonised further by the advertising Exec's at DFS for 'that' TV ad. As far as terrible cover versions go, 'We Will Rock You' by Five (5ive?!) is dire to the extreme. They might has well have put a copy of 'A Day At The Races' on the floor and all taken a steaming communal slash all over it.

Iv'e been to paradise , but Iv'e never been to me ???????



FECK



and that bloody awful song that Buffy Saint Marie wrote ...they lift us up where we belong , or the lift goes up where we belong .... or something .... dreadful .... she was allright ( mostly ) in the 60s .

Deee-lite's Groove is in the heart. Dreadful,dreadful song.


And years ago, in my student days, one Saturday morning,while watching The Chart Show, after too much the night before, this song or more precisely the video for it actually made me throw up.

Still brings me out in a cold sweat.




quite the reverse for me Lulu Too!


this track gives me a 'heat wave' when ever I hear it...


reminds me a of a fantastic night in a club with the second love of my life,

he was the hottest guy... went out with him when I was at the Royal College...

it was a balmy summers night, we walked back about 4.00 am

we spiced up the journey home by having sex in the churchyard off Blackfrair's Road

absolutely unforgettable...

I've got a new song that i detest..

SEXY MACARENA by some homeless dude, busking on the street near my work, who can't sing or play the guitar..It consists of those 2 words sung badly while the guitar was strummed randomly & he sang it to me whilst giving me a lusty look..

"I wish i was a little bit taller i wish i was a bawler i wish i had a rabbit in a hat da da da da something or other ... blah blah cant even get a date so what dya think O that" ........... F^&K off THEN !"!!


HAteful damn record . who was it by ,ski slope, or someone ? ????

flapjackdavey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I wish i was a little bit taller i wish i was a

> bawler i wish i had a rabbit in a hat da da da da

> something or other ... blah blah cant even get a

> date so what dya think O that" ........... F^&K

> off THEN !"!!

>

> HAteful damn record . who was it by ,ski slope, or

> someone ? ????


De La Soul?

Oh my goodness I always thought Groove in the heart was called Groovers in the hall. I also thought Take That's only takes a minute girl was Only takes a mini girl though so I obviously need to get my ears checked.


There's that Blue (i think) song that goes on about a girl who he's dancing up close with makes it 'hard' for him - i love and hate that one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just a quick note that my son was mugged last night on Dunstans Road just after 6pm. Two youths on bikes with balaclavas stole his phone, headphones and driver’s license near the mansion block next to Dawson’s Heights. Please be vigilant when walking in the area after dark. 
    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...