Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So with 17 confirmed at Alleyn's how many adults relatives etc etc have touched the trolleys at Sainsbury's pushed a pub door open or coughed in your face on the train?. Do the Math the 17 have all had contact with people who have contact with other people who have contact with even more people etc etc etc OINK!.

But if you have flu and your link is deemed tenuous ,ie you've caught flu from someone who has been in contact with an Alleyn's year 7 pupil ,then you are told that you won't be swabbed/tested.

And it's fine for your 3 year old sibling to carry on attending nursery.

So who knows how many cases ?

Always did think it unlikely that there would be sufficient resources to allow for everyone with flu or flu like symptoms to be tested.

And if you do have flu and a refusal to test ,how can you convince your school / examination body thar you're not faking it ?

robbo*uk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I think that in this recession hit time

> the drug companies are using the media to fully

> cover themselves. Media terrorism is a

> fantastically prevalent disease in countries like

> ours and I am in no doubt that Tamiflu are

> receiving astounding profits from our latest dose

> of terror. This is a sickness which is less potent

> than common flu and has so far made a few people

> slightly ill for a few days in England, yet when

> it hits Alleyns the ENTIRE school is given

> medication. Make up your own minds, but please

> dont read the Daily Mail.



GILEAD / ROCHE make Tamiflu. The profits from the Tamiflu stocks have already been booked years ago when the government bought a huge batch of the drug for UK residents. It is not a particularly profitable drug for these companies - far from it. Gilead actually make most of their profits from HIV drugs. Their HIV drug has turned what used to be a death sentence into a chronic disease. Hats of to them. Roche make their profits from cancer drugs mostly - and they reinvest 50% of those profits to discover new cancer drugs. If the drug companies that make Tamiflu were being sneaky they would want to dampen the media hype as each time Tamiflu is used, resistance will be around the corner. Ideally the drug is only used when it is absolutely necessary - ie. in a pandemic. (in terms of profits for both companies)

I don't work for drug companies but i'm baffled by the hatred of them. Fag companies have a better reputation yet they don't put any of their profits towards medical research - they purely profit from killing people.


grrr - rant over

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> R&A... reinvestment of profits is good business

> sense, not charity. e.g. Microsoft reinvested all

> their profits, up until 5 years ago. (I don't

> think drug companies are "evil", just providing

> balance to the argument).


The problem I have with drug companies is, do they develop disease to further their companys prosperity?. For example, take swine flu why is it that up until the past 10 years ago I had never heard of all the kinds of killer flu that we have now, is it hype over nothing or is it a man made bio hazard?.

DCPS is not letting the JAPS girls in the door to pick up siblings. They have also been banned from the DCPS school breakfast. The girls were standing forlornly outside this afternoon...


On the other hand, the headmaster is continuing to shake every child's hand every morning at the nursery...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite funny - are state schools still exempt from

> this flu?



I guess state schools don't often have school trips that involve travel to Mexico*







*disclaimer, I have no idea if this stems from that, there's no way I'm reading through 6 pages of thread to find out though

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...