Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So with 17 confirmed at Alleyn's how many adults relatives etc etc have touched the trolleys at Sainsbury's pushed a pub door open or coughed in your face on the train?. Do the Math the 17 have all had contact with people who have contact with other people who have contact with even more people etc etc etc OINK!.

But if you have flu and your link is deemed tenuous ,ie you've caught flu from someone who has been in contact with an Alleyn's year 7 pupil ,then you are told that you won't be swabbed/tested.

And it's fine for your 3 year old sibling to carry on attending nursery.

So who knows how many cases ?

Always did think it unlikely that there would be sufficient resources to allow for everyone with flu or flu like symptoms to be tested.

And if you do have flu and a refusal to test ,how can you convince your school / examination body thar you're not faking it ?

robbo*uk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I think that in this recession hit time

> the drug companies are using the media to fully

> cover themselves. Media terrorism is a

> fantastically prevalent disease in countries like

> ours and I am in no doubt that Tamiflu are

> receiving astounding profits from our latest dose

> of terror. This is a sickness which is less potent

> than common flu and has so far made a few people

> slightly ill for a few days in England, yet when

> it hits Alleyns the ENTIRE school is given

> medication. Make up your own minds, but please

> dont read the Daily Mail.



GILEAD / ROCHE make Tamiflu. The profits from the Tamiflu stocks have already been booked years ago when the government bought a huge batch of the drug for UK residents. It is not a particularly profitable drug for these companies - far from it. Gilead actually make most of their profits from HIV drugs. Their HIV drug has turned what used to be a death sentence into a chronic disease. Hats of to them. Roche make their profits from cancer drugs mostly - and they reinvest 50% of those profits to discover new cancer drugs. If the drug companies that make Tamiflu were being sneaky they would want to dampen the media hype as each time Tamiflu is used, resistance will be around the corner. Ideally the drug is only used when it is absolutely necessary - ie. in a pandemic. (in terms of profits for both companies)

I don't work for drug companies but i'm baffled by the hatred of them. Fag companies have a better reputation yet they don't put any of their profits towards medical research - they purely profit from killing people.


grrr - rant over

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> R&A... reinvestment of profits is good business

> sense, not charity. e.g. Microsoft reinvested all

> their profits, up until 5 years ago. (I don't

> think drug companies are "evil", just providing

> balance to the argument).


The problem I have with drug companies is, do they develop disease to further their companys prosperity?. For example, take swine flu why is it that up until the past 10 years ago I had never heard of all the kinds of killer flu that we have now, is it hype over nothing or is it a man made bio hazard?.

DCPS is not letting the JAPS girls in the door to pick up siblings. They have also been banned from the DCPS school breakfast. The girls were standing forlornly outside this afternoon...


On the other hand, the headmaster is continuing to shake every child's hand every morning at the nursery...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite funny - are state schools still exempt from

> this flu?



I guess state schools don't often have school trips that involve travel to Mexico*







*disclaimer, I have no idea if this stems from that, there's no way I'm reading through 6 pages of thread to find out though

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you - and last night was really terrible where I am. Between midnight and 1am was the worst, where it genuinely felt like a war zone. I had to run out of my house to try and stop a grown man setting them off in open space right by our front doors. In response he went to throw a half lit one at me and then seemed to think better of it. I am so sad at how bad the situation has got here and how selfish people are. Fireworks are bad for the environment and for pets and wildlife, as well as just being unnecessary noise for people too. I have sent an email today to Helen Hayes, which I have done previously on this issue. Would advise anyone to write to your MP to do the same, and to ask them to engage with the debates scheduled for 19 Jan. 
    • And they started long before midnight!
    • First mate - I wondered if I was imagining things at 4.45 this morning . Apparently not .
    • The Dutch are addicted to New Year fireworks and spent €130million this year on them. However,  sales to individuals will be banned as from this year and celebrations will be organised by local and city councils. I have Dutch friends and for them, this can’t come soon enough. However, at least there it’s concentrated  on one night. Here, it’s never ending, any excuse to make a noise is seized upon with gusto. In addition to the annual celebrations, add birthdays, weddings, engagements, divorces, christenings, BBQs, etc etc. I dare say you can funerals to that list as well. Yesterday it started mid-afternoon and just carried on until the early hours. In the past, I’ve been woken up at 4am. Anyyone who doesn’t like it can go hang and you can ignore completely the  effects on people’s animals and wildlife. Don’t hold your breath about anything being done here, however. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...