Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitest.


Recommended Posts

I have been longing for a good cinema within safe walking distance in ED, and was delighted to hear that one was coming in the form of East Dulwich Picturehouse. However, I have not been able to go as I just can't justify the cost, approx ?25 for my wife and me! Even membership only saves a couple of pounds. Not to mention the cost of drinks etc.


As with most new things in ED it is aimed at the 'new money' residents and does not take into account us lowly residents of twenty-five years plus, who have contributed to the area and community in that period.


Wholly unfair and saddening that whole sections of our community are excluded.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/63167-ed-picturehouse-elitest/
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That does seem really expensive, but people will

> pay it, so they will charge it. They couldn't give

> a shit about people that can't pay, so long as

> they're filling the seats, of which there are

> about 8, so they're laughing.


?25/2=?12.5x8=?100. They'll be out of business in no time, unless they put their prices up.

For me (in SE22 for 25 years) cinema used to be the sticky noisy experience of PeckhamPlex or a trek to a cinema further afield. Plus in recent years babysitting costs. ED Picturehouse is not only a more pleasant experience (happy to pay a fiver for that) but saves an hour's worth of babysitting which is another wedge. And there aren't the economies of scale of an auditorium that can pack in hundreds of people. So for me it's not a rip off, it's good value. Drinks/snacks? - jeez, who needs those at the cinema?

bonaome Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That does seem really expensive, but people

> will

> > pay it, so they will charge it. They couldn't

> give

> > a shit about people that can't pay, so long as

> > they're filling the seats, of which there are

> > about 8, so they're laughing.

>

> ?25/2=?12.5x8=?100. They'll be out of business in

> no time, unless they put their prices up.



I wasn't actually being entirely serious when I said they had 8 seats.

Saturday early-evening show at the Odeon in North Greenwich is ?10.90 for an adult ticket vs ?12.60 for the same film at the same time at ED Picturehouse.


Given the convenience of having a cinema on a high street location you can walk to and not have to park vs the out of town retail park I don't agree it is bad value when compared to the wider mass market.


(ps in case I get accused of choosing an expensive one to compare to, the same ticket costs ?11 in Liverpool!)

Could ticket prices perhaps be on a sliding scale, so that those residents with the longest 'years of service' to the community could get cheaper seats?


Or perhaps get the whole place to themselves, with free popcorn, a footrub - and a lightly applauding guard of honour lining the streets when they exit.

Salted popcorn *Bob*, Salted please.



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could ticket prices perhaps be on a sliding scale,

> so that those residents with the longest 'years of

> service' to the community could get cheaper

> seats?

>

> Or perhaps get the whole place to themselves, with

> free popcorn, a footrub - and a lightly applauding

> guard of honour lining the streets when they exit.

I agree that cinema ticket prices are expensive but that's general all over the country. Ticket prices mostly cover studio and distributor costs. The theatres make the majority of their profit on food and drinks sales. This has been the way since at least the late '80s.


In order to compete in this tough market Picturehouse cinemas aim their brand at the middle classes for a slightly more expensive, "better" cinema experience where you can see a mix of mainstream, independent and classic films. That's their shtick. You pay more to get more.


Up until recently I lived in Hackney. When I bought a Picturehouse membership last year it cost about ?45 and for that I got three free tickets plus a ?2 discount on every ticket I buy subsequent to that. On Mondays Picturehouses lower their tickets to ?6 so with my membership discount I was getting to go to a cinema in London once a week for ?4. The cost of three tickets at ?12.50 is approaching ?40 so you've almost made it worthwhile there, and every visit thereafter just makes it more worthwhile. If you don't go to the cinema often then a single visit is going to seem expensive but, as has been mentioned before, it's ?11 to go to the Odeon in Liverpool. Comparatively PH prices aren't too much out of line with the rest of the country.


And this is on the bloomin' high street so you're saving on bus/train/parking/petrol.


AND they're doing a deal at the moment for members where if you buy a bottle of beer you get a free double Jamesons with a mixer. I got myself and a friend half-soused for less than nine quid on Lordship Lane without having to sit at a bus stop with a brown paper bag.


If this is elitist call me Lord Snot.


It's probably worth mentioning that I do not work for Picturehouse Cinemas.

Well you never know, Bob. A poor person might crime you to death if you are brave or stupid enough to walk down that meanest of mean streets, Rye Lane. Better sticking with the Foxtons fat tie brigade and yummy mummy hot yoga oiks who moan about people sitting in their precious caffe nero for more than half an hour.

I have lived in East Dulwich since 1989 and Nunhead before that. A friend of mine was stabbed at the top of Rye Lane and a sister-in-law narrowly escaped being bundled into a car. They are just what comes to mind immediately without considering all of the incidents I've heard about in those thirty or so years.


Admittedly both where a while ago, but I really would not want to risk walking with my wife along Rye Lane in the dark just as an experiment to prove that things may have improved. Where would you run to?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...