Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agreed with Mockney RE the Vale. When it first opened, we had some classic nights down there, and for a while would stumble down there almost weekly, and between us we must have put literally thousands in to the owner's pocket (that is not an exaggeration).


Yet, they were rude to us, they threw a couple of people out for doing things that they actually weren't doing (not when they were accused of it anyway). They're horrible little men who think they are something special! (td)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed with Mockney RE the Vale. When it first

> opened, we had some classic nights down there, and

> for a while would stumble down there almost

> weekly, and between us we must have put literally

> thousands in to the owner's pocket (that is not an

> exaggeration).

>

> Yet, they were rude to us, they threw a couple of

> people out for doing things that they actually

> weren't doing (not when they were accused of it

> anyway). They're horrible little men who think

> they are something special! (td)


It wasn't too bad when it first re-opened but over the last two years it been going downhill. Its now basically the old pub with a new interior and its impossible to get a decent drink in there these days. The turnover of staff is mind-boggling.

Oh! come on Ant the food in the Dog's not that bad. It's certainly improved from a few years back when Barney and his Mrs were running the place but then again I only go to the pub to drink because that's what they are primarily there for, if I want to eat out I'll go to a restaurant. Still, I may well pop in and try out the "new" Plough soon enough and will report back.

I keep intending to try the dog on a non-sunday, but it's sunday lunches have long been the victim of their own popularity, particularly the watery gravy; bleagh enough places to go without having to suffer those again (dark horse anyone?). The BBQ was ok, but I guess it's not been fired up much this summer.


I'm looking forward to checking the plough. Went occasionally up there to catch footie when everywhere else too packed, but it was, frankly, s**t.

You've made a good point there Mockney about the Dog's popularity on a Sunday lunchtime. It's probably the one day that I tend to avoid it, or I'll pop in later on when all the families with kids who have gone there to eat have buggered off back home and I can get some elbow room at the bar and get the drinks in.
Went from about 5 - 545. Sat in the garden before it peeed it down. It's ok. Nice, airy, and I *like* Angela Lansbury so I am quite fond of the high-backed chair area. ?2.65 for a pint of Greene King. Not sure whether I would make a beeline for it again, but might just pop in occasionally. Nero

Its going to be very interesting how things work out there and I shall be going once a week purely out of a morbid curiosity. What was evident yesterday is that the old crowd do not seem to recognise that the refurb wasn't intended for their benefit despite the amount of notices outside which clearly emphasised what kind of behaviour is expected in there now. I can't imagine the manager was thrilled by the four-man punch up in the car park taking place during the school run , or by the fact that the beer garden already has a "lord of the flies" feel to it.

The inside is quite good, well half of it is, the patio side is basically still full of the boorish, foul-mouthed losers who drank there previously.

Beers good though!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...