Jump to content

Recommended Posts

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A public vote doesn't mean objectivity (see the

> mob mentality with the MPs allowances hubbud for

> example).

>

> If I had watched BGT for the last ten weeks or so

> I'd feel I was sold a pup.


I don't get you.


Was anyone suggesting a vote means objectivity?


And why would you feel that?

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have to say it was the best thing on tv for the

> past week and the final was fantastic! Well done

> to Diversity who really were the best


Surely not better than watching Barcelona win the Champions League! :)

I see where you're coming from Daizie but I think the controversy in the past about Phone voting has forced the TV companies to clarify the rules on this. The fact that Diversity won over the much acclaimed and Bookies favourite Susan Boyle somewhat confirms this. Why do people think that Diversity's win was a fix? They were IMO by far the best performers on the night and had come in as second after Susan Boyle in the semi-final.

I can't watch BGT (Amanda Holden and Penis Morgan make me too queasy) but I did catch some of the final).


Taken as a whole, completely dreadful.


The usual nauseating Silvia Young-fodder all present and correct, naturally.

Great to see borderline obesity in the younger generation is still as hilarious as ever.

The old man / young girl act managed to pull-off being both saccharine and creepy at the same time.

My favourite was the guy in the beenie hat playing sax - completely ridiculous.

And congratulations to the winners: they must be praying for 3-2-1 to make a comeback.

Or the Generation game....


Back when I was 16 The central School of dance came to my school, oh we were so excited there were all these lovely girls as fit as could be teaching us contemporary/modern dance & we loved it ( come on it's a teenage boys living dream), then the male dancer did a performance which was amazing. Well of course this was the life for me......YES I WANT TO DANCE.........

Once we calmed down the subject of career's came up "Oh if your really lucky & good you could be one of the dancers on the generation game"


I pursued a career in design (thankfully)



W**F



* Oh & Logs.... *

I imagine Diversity - (they missed a trick there.. should have gone for Divercity.. *does streetwise hand motioning*) - backstage after the big win, sloping off to the toilets one by one to calculate how the prize money divvies-up.. wishing they had a few fewer members.


Does Ashley(20) get the same as Mitchell (12)? Doesn't seem right. "Yeah but no but.."

Okay, fair enough. My (bigoted)opinions are neither here or there.


If we put 'Diversity' before an international jury and said this is the best the UK/GB can offer (voted by the public) would you be impressed as a US/French/Italian judging panel?


My concerns are about manipulation - and I'm as susceptible as the next person.


What really worries me about programmes like this (and Big Brother, Get me out of here... etc) is the future.


The advertising/media world is now all about fragmentising, ie divide and rule. Get a 'community' to talk about things that interest them or even trivia and:


a) we know know who you are

b) we know your interests (ie your posts, your holidays booked to xx destination, the items you've purchased, your favourite hotel in Paris/Istanbul etc)

c) your aspirations (whether or not your credit card limit allows for this)


In short your profile.


How do I explain to my kids don't get Sky, don't press the red button - don't sign up for ED Forum/Facebook/Twitter - don't get a credit card/HP agreement etc despite all the hype. Everything you do will be monitored.


The day I put my card into a cashpoint/ATM machine and the display says 'happy birthday' will be the day I think it's time to head for the cash economy elsewhere.


To cut a long story short the hairy Scottish girl with the great voice should have won.

Yeah, but the media juggernaut that is Big Brother starts this week, and as usual, goes on and on for ever and ever.


Maybe I'll just de-tune Channel 4 so I don't accidentally catch a glimpse of the fame-hungry morons. Oh, and stop reading the papers, looking at any websites, and listening to strangers on the bus.


Or just move to France, maybe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...