Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Labour Party decimated tonight to such an extent that they came 5th/6th in some Regions.


For the first time ever in Wales they did not receive the most votes. They have enjoyed that privilege since 1918.


Nick Griffin has just become the second BNP M.E.P.


The UKIP Party has, easily, beat The Labour Party in many Regions.


The Liberal Democrats have not increased their vote at all, despite the appalling loss of Labour Votes.


I believe Labour lost 240,000 out of 600,000 North West votes, cataclysmic by any standards.


Stll Gordon will plough on regardless as there are no credible alternatives as Messrs Johnson/Miliband are hemmed in to the new Cabinet.

No I meant the right and centre right parties across Europe did well, and the left , except in poland i hear, did really badly. Not sure that it is an odd subject , i thought about posting about the new pizza place but felt that this seismic political event should be my first. What i think is, if parliment gets disolved, if thhe ruling party are forced to call a general election then the country will really be turning a corner, for the worse.
BNP received 7% of the vote. Almost everyone is saying "ah, those people didn't really know all the racist policies of the BNP and it was a protest vote" but I heard one commentator on the BBC last night get it right when he said "There are, and always have been, racist undertones in the UK (just as there are in all other Western countries)". Around 7% sounds about right. This means that 93% are not racist by the way.


What an 'odd' comment for your 110th post, Taper...


Whynniard, thanks for opening up the debate, and welcome to the forum. I wholeheartedly agree, the increase in popularity of the extreme right, both here in the UK and across Europe, is worrying to say the least.


UKip, who are hardly liberal in their policies, have also done well. The fact that Lib Dem did not scoop up most of Labour's losses seems both surprising and worrying, they seem to have some pretty sound policies and appear to be a solid alternative to those who no longer feel able to vote Labour.


Hopeful things will balance out a bit by the general elections. I wonder if political disenchantment and disillusionment meant that many of the 'middle ground' voters did not bother to turn out last week, and ony those with more extreme views bothered!


For those who did not vote last week... next time may be even more critical...

http://www.pcs.org.uk/objects_store/make_your_vote_count.gif


your vote counts

The only vote that collapsed was Labour's. The majority of other main parties were either static or slightly up /down by a few % points.


Smaller parties benefited - but at a General Election will lose out again.


Also demonstrates that PR as a voting system makes it hard to actually change the make up of the top dogs in the political system. Labour's vote declined by 7% but no siesmic change in the overall make up of the parties representing UK in Europe. Remains dominated by Conservatives, Labour, UUKIP and Lib Dems.

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read that in the North West, the numbes voting

> for the BNP actually went down since the last

> election. The only reason they won a seat there

> was because the other parties' votes collapsed

> even more.



That's what was being said on R4 this morning, only a 1% increase in the BNP vote overall or summat.

We are all in the sh*t holding the stick, what is a change of government going to do now at this precise point

Oh yes we will be holding a different stick but in same sh*t that's all. I am not a great fan of G.B ,however the fiscal measures he has put in place are taking shape , there are shifts in mood. We will have to sit it out a while yet , the next 12 months are going to be rough no matter who takes the helm. Euro and council elections are used as 'tools' to beat the ruling parties with.

Will labour win the next election,mmm ask me in 12 months a lot can happen in a year



W**F

Woof said


"I am not a great fan of G.B ,however the fiscal measures he has put in place are taking shape , there are shifts in mood. We will have to sit it out a while yet".


The problem is not the next 12 months and whether Labour can hang on or even win the next election. It is the actions that have to be taken to ensure economic stability over the next ten years. The debt mountain that this government has created is huge. Unless we are all prepared to see taxes increasing by 10% or more then we have to accept real cuts in the cost of public services.


I emphasise this is cutting the cost - not necessarily the actual services. No matter what political party wins the next election this will have to be done - and GB is fudging the issue by trying to create a dividing line between "Tory Cuts" and "Labour Investment" (previously known as "Public Spending).


In Canada 10 years ago, when in a similar deep financial hole they managed to reduce costs of public services by almost 20% without significant impact on frontline public services.

taper:


You seem a decent person and I hope you saw the reference to yourgoodself at 10.30 AM in the final paragraph on the "French Students" thread.


Don't take it personally but after engaging in endless thousands of conversations, both in "real" life (lol) and on various internet fora with Non-White Guys, I did have to laugh when you made a comment to me a while ago on an emotive Racial Subject, which I've long forgotten.;-)

Bigbad


Yes, the name made me suspicious too. But I'm happy to take Whynniard's word that his/her intention is not as I first painted it.


Tony


I've replied to that reference on the other thread. I thought initially your preoccupation with race related issues was similarly suspicious. But you have long since shown yourself to be a sagacious and creative commentator on a range of issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...