Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At about 7pm this evening, finally managed to park up in Sainsburys and when I was walking up to the store, through the disabled parking section this BMW pulled into a disabled space and a 20 something male got out, in full Sainsbury's uniform and started work collecting up the trolleys. And before you ask, no he wasn't disabled and no, he wasn't displaying a badge in his car.


With all the sensitivities around wrongly parking in these bays, and the sign saying that you will be fined ?50, I thought it was a bit much for an employee to be abusing the bays.


The customer service desk 'apologised' a lot, but didn't ask which car it was etc and when I volunteered I just got one of those grins which said yeah yeah yeah.

A couple of years ago I complained to customer services, having seen something similar. Their response? "Oh, we allow our employees to use the disabled bays at night". It's not on.


PippaD - I think it is wrong to let anyone other than the disabled to use these bays. Parking somewhere else is inconvenient for a parent and child; it's a major issue for the disabled. Sainsburys should be taken to task for that policy, too.

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uh, i don;t get the whole children and parent

> parking thing.Why do they need special parking

> places? Just asking, like.


The spaces between the cars are wider, so it's easier to get your anklebiters in and out of car seats etc.


I think they should be further away from the main entrance though, not closer to it.

Why cant they just make all the spaces wider and just have Disabled bays ,I'm fed up with people digging my paintwork when opening their doors ,so I just park further away where theres more room.the car park at DKH is so big there is always somewhere to park. Some ablebodied people are just too damn lazy to walk a few yards .Its not as if they got to carry bags of shopping for miles there are trolleys after all.

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uh, i don;t get the whole children and parent

> parking thing.Why do they need special parking

> places? Just asking, like.


Nor did I, until I had kids, just telling. Shall we leave it at that?


ps Sorry, hit the wrong button and PMd this by mistake too!

i agree with NORTHLONDONER....i think that just because someone has kids it should not give them them the right to park right by the entrance,sometimes when you go into supermarkets the place is like a nursery with kids runnin riot everywhere and the parents not caring at all..(ON FRIDAY 2 BOYS WERE IN THERE PLAYING WITH RADIO CONTROL CARS)...my personal thoughts are that kids are the parents choice most of the time,so just ge ton with it ,after all most parents dont reall care that thier kids are annoying somone else in the supermarkets..THIS SHOULD GET THE TOPIC MOVIN..

Quids, actually I'm a parent too. And when my lad were a nipper (back in the late 1800s) we survived quite well without parent and child parking. But then again, we are talking about a pony and cart. I'm not against p and c parking..I;m sure I'd be the first one in there if my boy were of a portable age.

But Likansuk does have a point (as well as a porny user name). Many ED parents do need to get a grip and realise that not everyone is charmed by their rosy cheeked offspring rampaging around "expressing" themselves.

Pip pip!

I'm a parent and I think they should be further away.


It just pisses people off. There are never any spaces there anyway, because they're always filled by pissed-off people without children parking in them anyway, leading to even more pissed-off people with children getting pissed-off with people without children parking in them, leading to pissed-off people waiting for spaces, and occasionally tedious shouting matches.


Put them on the other side of the car park, where there's infinite room to spread out, not piss anyone off, and a nice, short, safe walk round the edge on a path to the store door.

I never understood why you need parent and child bays til I had a baby either. You do need more room to open the door fully to get them out of the car. No real reason why they need to be close to the store I guess. In fact, might be better if they were further away so then only the people who really need them would do so.

Considering the amount of running around you have to do as a parent during the average day, an extra fifty yards walk to the entrance of Sainsburys is utterly meaningless, should the parent parking be located further away.


There's nothing 'essential' about it whatsoever.


Parent parking away from the entrance, with a stack of kiddy-trollies laid-on special, makes sense.


Then we can have even more room to accommodate parents who insist on eight foot wide six-wheel-drive cars with pumped-up suspension and bull bars on the front (also essential for urban living, it seems)

I don't think parents with children are a recognised disabled group, so Sainsbury's would be under no obligation to provide them with parking spaces.


So logically, it's only a marketing gimmick.


Sainsbury's obviously feel they retain more business from a valuable customer base by having them there.


If they don't police it, then they must feel that the gesture is sufficient to attract these customers, who no doubt lay the blame for misuse at the hands of other customers rather than the management.


Everyone's a winner.

Quite often when I'm parked in regular stalls we get back to the car and someone has parked so close to our car that I can't get my kid into his car seat. That little extra bit of room gets him in and out safely. I know that parents shouldn't get special treatment, but it's also true that life with a toddler is scary enough. If a trip to any business is nightmarish with him than I really do stop going (childless people smiling everywhere). But the wise businesses know this, hence parent stalls.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think parents with children are a

> recognised disabled group, so Sainsbury's would be

> under no obligation to provide them with parking

> spaces.

>

> So logically, it's only a marketing gimmick.

>

> Sainsbury's obviously feel they retain more

> business from a valuable customer base by having

> them there.

>

> If they don't police it, then they must feel that

> the gesture is sufficient to attract these

> customers, who no doubt lay the blame for misuse

> at the hands of other customers rather than the

> management.

>

> Everyone's a winner.


Indeed, to stretch the point further, most car drivers aren't disabled either, let's just get rid of the parking at Sainsbury's altogether, pesky marketing gimmick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...