Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The prospect of fire taps into man?s prehistoric instincts, resulting in their donning of the novelty apron and reaching for the lighter fluid before cremating William Rose?s finest meat products.


Women stand aside (with one eye on the fire extinguisher)and prepare suitable accompaniments to attempt to disguise the ever familiar carbon taste.

Richard Bacon on radio 5 last night spoke to a girl who hosted a bbq as part of her hen party weekend away. They (10 girls) spent an hour getting everything prepared, marinades, salads etc. then remembered they should get the bbq going - 2 hours later (by her own admission) they actually had something to cook on, none of the group of 10 knew how to get a charcoal bbq started.


I know you can make your own sperm now, but for this you need men.

My dad is awesome at BBQ's.


Why?


Because in the commando's he was taught to light a fire Ray Mears style. That's right ladies, with wood and a piece of string!


How do ya like them apples eh?



However



There was that time when he used lighter fuel in 1997-98 and the apple tree went up in smoke.


I didn't like the taste of them apples.

Women do the hard work, men get the glory....


1. Woman goes to buthcher and buys food for bbq

2. Woman diligently prepares marinades and salads etc

3. Woman greets guests, makes sure they all have a drink and children are fed and occuppied

4. Man has a beer with male guests - he lights bbq with an appreciative audience

5. Man cremates food on bbq while talking to friends at same time

6. Woman rescues food with suitable sauces and good presentation

7. Woman sets table etc

8. Guests tuck in and congratulate man on his cooking

9. Man falls asleep on sofa, after congratulating himself on a job well done

10. Woman sees guests out and tidies and washes up.

11. Man snores

Or if you were at my house last weekend it goes something like this


1. Man gets off phone and says "don't hate me but my mums birthday BBQ is now happening here there'll be here in a couple of hours but don't worry they're going to go to Sainsburys on the way"

2. Woman says, we don't even have a BBQ.

3. Man say I'll get them to buy a couple of disposable ones

4. Woman hectically cleans while man has a fag.

...

...

..

63. Mans sisters do the BBQ while woman finishes off salads etc. while man has fag and alcohol.

That sounds like the kind of BBQ's I used to have when I had a husband MM. Now I can get my charcoal started with little fuss and cook some wicked food on it to boot. I must admit that the first one I did on my own, I struggled with the lighting of it but after a few tears of frustration and perseverance I'd say it was pretty good and am getting better by the chop!!

Michael, Michael, Michael!!!!


Stop It !!


You added a little "spice" with this thread and now you backtrack with your ( admittedly ralistic lol ) list of 11 points while "Women do the hard work, men get the glory.... "


Followed swiftly by :-


"After all if a man can do it, it can't be too difficult."....


Be like The Aussie Batsmen and go forward with the front foot and don't defend..B)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...