Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are going to other planets for more food? We have plenty here! We just haven't found a way of sharing it (Big Lunch today notwithstanding!) - it'll be the same should we "make it" anywhere else. "Virus with shoes" as Agent Smith says...


I know I'm coming across as a killjoy here but it was about whether the landing was a hoax or not. Umm.. will you believe me if I say I'm actually in a great mood?


Marmora Man - absolutely true about Fort William of course. I had a great time up there - but the town itself when I first drove there? Several scenes from Trainspotting came to mind

Just imagine all the wonderful things we could do today, if we hadn't spent all that money on the Apollo missions.


The world's largest bouncy castle, four miles high, situation in Orkney.

A tunnel under Belgium.

A personal jetpack for every British Citizen over the age of 13.

Pay U2 not to make any more records.

you lot are forgetting the greatest achievement, that famous NASA space pen, that you could buy in argos, that can write underwater ( v useful if they ever find some on mars ) & do all sorts of other stuff. I love the fact that it cost lots to develop & the russians just took pencils

Andystar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you lot are forgetting the greatest achievement,

> that famous NASA space pen, that you could buy in

> argos, that can write underwater ( v useful if

> they ever find some on mars ) & do all sorts of

> other stuff. I love the fact that it cost lots to

> develop & the russians just took pencils


Damn, i was just looking for a pic & have now found out that its a hoax, damn you bloody internet...


In conclusion, there was obviously no point in going to the moon

I used to think I could do without the products the space race gave us (even Rocket WD40, which is great on my bike), but SatNav is pretty bloody useful. I don't know if it justifies the billions spent though. Space exploration may just be the biggest vanity project in history.

I stayed up late and watched the 1969 landing with my dad - the event had a profound effect on my life. So much so that I am now a consultant to a foundation who's objective is to launch a manned mission beyond the solar system. That position has brought into sharp focus the huge scale and nature of the technological difficulties posed by manned space travel.


I have come to the conclusion that lay observers cannot now know with any certainty whether the Apollo moon landings were genuine or staged. Ignoring the obvious nonsense there are persuasive arguments on both sides. NASA has never formally refuted the objections. None of the orbital lunar mappers have conclusively identified any landing sites despite having equal or greater resolution than earth mapping satellites while orbiting at much lower altitudes. Yet, one can clearly see motor cars - which are about the same size as the lunar lander's launch platform - on Google Earth's satellite images.


2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1968. It features a special effects-generated representation of the lunar landscape that remains unsurpassed to this day. Its production cost was $10 million. NASA had a budget of some $25 billion (~$136 billion in 2007 Dollars). That sort of money could buy an awful lot of special effects. I just don?t know.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> 2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1968. It

> features a special effects-generated

> representation of the lunar landscape that remains

> unsurpassed to this day.


Well, not really.


I saw '2001', coincidentally, on Friday and the BFI.

I also went to the lunar photographic exhibition at the Hayward gallery.


One is a film with special effects.

The other was pictures taken on the moon.


It was pretty obvious.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One is a film with special effects.

> The other was pictures taken on the moon.

>

> It was pretty obvious.


A lay observer couldn't prove the location of those pictures to a scientific standard, though. As things stand, it's still a matter of faith. I'm sure Kubrick could have faked some pretty convincing lunarscapes with a fraction of NASA's budget, if he'd been given the opportunity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...