Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, the ?Dulwich Community Council has made an award to provide a new centrepiece for the roundabout? (at Goose Green). Contact [email protected] for info.


yes/no response sheets have been circulated (?) seeking views about the centrepiece:

1. A Tree. (Trees are nice. And there aren?t any around for . . . well . . . metres)

2. A Signpost. (Signposts are nice. They point to Camberwell and Peckham and places, like those on real road signs)

3. A Lantern. (Lanterns are nice. And, at night, it could illuminate . . . er . . . itself)

3a* Flowers planted by the Parks Dept. (Don?t they look after the roundabout anyway?)

3b* A Fountain. (Drowned football fans every morning after an England defeat . . . hmm, there?s a certain appeal. Ah no! - it would not be provided by a fountain expert, it would become a number 4)

4. An Art Installation. (Art is nice, isn?t it? But there are some genuine concerns for creators and consumers.)

Public art has three audience groups (LDI), those who Like it, those who Dislike it, and those who are largely Indifferent (but may be steered into saying it?s good/clever/colourful/worthwhile/useless/eyesore/waste of money/etc by the other two groups).

Any Art Installation in a public area, where people cannot choose whether or not to view it, will invariably be an irritant to some, possibly many. Maybe we don?t care.


Unlike Fast Food, Art has a good press. It is assumed to be inherently ?good?.

Once particular individuals/small authoritarian groups (PISAGs) initiate the idea that there should be ?art? in a certain place, the genie can never be fully re-corked.

PISAGs decide who should create the art. They have a congenital belief that they know best.

ED and its environs are stuffed with artists, craftspeople, designers, inventors and creatives ? yet PISAGs ignore them for the favoured or famous.

Residents and others who have to ?face the art? on a daily basis have no special consideration. Consultation = notice to proceed.


Look at the borders of SE15/SE22 where bollards were commissioned from Rhodes and Gormley. A gift of a brief ? constrained dimensions and materials for a single practical function ? which resulted in expensive, worse-for-wear, embarrassing street clutter. Who decided this should be public art? Who chose the artists? Why weren?t residents asked if they wanted this art? Dunno. Munygon. Computersayno.


Imagine canvassing views at the EDT (because it overlooks the roundabout) at about 10.30 pm, after a long hot Saturday of loosening aesthetic inhibitions. A sudden landslide of opinion may well result in, say, a full-size study of Mr Stay Puft (Ghost Busters 1984) being installed on the roundabout. It would be legitimate because it would satisfy the LDI principle . . . but you know (you do know, don?t you?) the PISAGs wouldn?t stand for it.


What to do?


* I made up 3a and 3b

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/731-roundabout-at-goose-green/
Share on other sites

Can I just say that i LOVE our bollards. I don't regard them as "street clutter" as all. I think it's really nice to have something functional yet quirky - which is exactly what they are. And there are some lovely mosaics on Bellenden Road as part of that commission as well.

Personally I love art dotted around - it makes me feel I am part of a unique environment,with character and interest. How dull if everything was uniform.

Hi Mark,

Lordy - I don't want bollards on there either - I was just referring to the post!

I agree with you - some art or other significant feature would be lovely. Not really fussed about signage and would like something a little different other than just another tree .... though of course all trees are good things :)

I quite liked it when the shop that is now the William Roses' cow went missing and then after an appeal did a mysterious reappearing act on the roundabout. Not to encourage petty vandalism (students, you know who you are) but it sort of looked like an art installation.

All the proposals would restrict drivers' lines vision across the roundabout or may distract drivers when navigating the roundabout and would make the roundabout more unsafe.


The Community Council will have access to the risk assessment for each of the proposals.


I am unsure of the legal corporate liability of Community Council members who make a "bad decision".

I like to be surrounded by art too, and have never yet considered the local provision to be clutter.


I don't quite understand JA's original post: is this saying there is a current petition inviting us to tick 1-4 (not 3a/3b)?


Is JA saying (s)he reckons they're all 'nice', but doesn't think art is a good option, or is this on someone's petition?


What are we being invited to do - specify whether we're LDI, or establish ourselves as a PISAG?


Assuming I'm an L and a PISAG, I did have some sensible suggestions months ago: I'm not a great fan of abstract art, but would like to see something celebrating either Viscount Lord Bolingbroke, or wasn't Enid Blyton born here on LL? A bronze of our favourite local writer ties in nicely with buggies, and our rural gentle friendly village community feel.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All the proposals would restrict drivers' lines

> vision across the roundabout or may distract

> drivers when navigating the roundabout and would

> make the roundabout more unsafe.

>


I used to live (temporarily) in a certain new town, west of London. The council there actually deliberatly obscured the view across some of the roundabouts, to force the boy racers to stop and look before entering the roundabout. Not sure if it worked, though...

Macroban, I'm sure nobody's going to endanger traffic. It comes across like you're trying to threaten Council members with legal action just for having a view? Is that trying to shut down debate? I may have misunderstood.


Is this an appropriate way to ruin Fireworks night?

Blyton's attitudes and language are pretty dated. But if an actual statue of her might cause controversy, how about a representation of her astonishing rate of literary productivity. More than 800 books, plus magazine articles, and at one point an estimated output of 10,000 words a day (thank you Wikipedia). I am in total awe, even if not all of those words were really complex. How about a monument of a perpetually moving keyboard, probably solar-powered? Those who were so-inclined could even take it as a tribute to the Forum....

I just got the shiny leaflet in the post this morning. I opened it and assumed it was a parody from a local lobby group moaning about the ridiculous things councils waste their time on... then I registered the logo and legit website address, and, as it dawned on me that it was genuine, my heart sank.


How much is Southwark spending to consult us all on window dressing, while they make decisions about (extending the metaphor) knocking down the walls and converting hospitals to munitions factories behind closed doors?


I think we should commission a situationist theatre ensemble to a bit of durational live art on the roundabout 24/7. Get some hoodies on Modern Apprenticeships and New Deal to perform it. Back in the '70s they did shows with revolving stages -- this could be one with a revolving audience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...