Jump to content

Foxtons: Turn the lights out!

bigblue99

By bigblue99
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brendan

Brendan

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There is a lot of Foxtons hatred about and I don't

> understand it - if you were selling a house they

> are probably the best at getting a good price,

> thats why they have been successful.


On that reasoning if you buy a house through them you are more likely to pay over the odds. Which shouldn?t really attract customers should it?


But does the general slurry ever reason things out through more than one step? Do they fuck?..

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>if you were selling a house they are probably

> the best at getting a good price, thats why they

> have been successful.

> Evidence???



Actually, the only "evidence" I've seen actually goes against them - a consumer programme on TV last year about shady dealing and underhanded tactics used by EAs. If my memory serves me correctly, Foxtons featured (rather negatively) in that prog.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted
the seller pays the estate agent to get the best price on a sale the buyer has no contract with the agent. Sellers choose foxtons despite their selling commission being one of the highest. And yes brendan you may pay more if you buy through foxtons. But thats difficult to confirm.
steveo

steveo

Posted
Posted
My guess is that the branch manager may, if he can be bothered, look at this thread and conclude that as the edf is in flux about the issue, bugger 'em, burn that electric until there's no electric left. After all the forumites are already living here so commissions from them will be nish. Why rock the boat? The area manager would never understand why I, we, some of us, don't want a multi coloured swap shop and a load of parked up minis down the end of the strip.
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> graham26 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Absolutely brilliant. Low energy or not, its

> still

> > energy- WATSED.

> >

> > Foxtons are the worst of a rather awful bunch.

>

> Wat Graham26 sed.



I get it HB!!! I get it. :)

Brendan

Brendan

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the seller pays the estate agent to get the best

> price on a sale the buyer has no contract with the

> agent. Sellers choose foxtons despite their

> selling commission being one of the highest. And

> yes brendan you may pay more if you buy through

> foxtons. But thats difficult to confirm.


Well if estate agent Z will sell your house for more than estate agent X then the buyer will pay more through estate agent Z than if they went through estate agent X. So why should a buyer go through estate agent Z then?


Moreover if sell through estate agent Z you then go and buy your next gaff through them you will be paying an inflated price (coz that?s what they are so good at doing) effectively negating anything that you think you ?made? from having some spiky haired fukstick sell your old house in the first place.


So you aren?t better off at all. The banks are because higher mortgages mean more interest and the agents and conveyancers are because they skim off the top. You however have benefited sweet f-all except for being able to have that same conversation about house prices that everyone has over and over and over again ad nauseum across the land.



But you know. Who am I to question how the backbone of the great British economy works.

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So why should a buyer go through estate agent Z then?


I don't think it works like that in practise. I wouldn't just pop into my "favourite" estate agents and ask them to show me what they've got. I'd pick a selection of properties online (regardless of the agent), and then ask to see those specific properties. If my favourite one was exclusively on the market with Foxtons, then I'd begrudgingly go through them.

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > > Absolutely brilliant. Low energy or not, its

> > still

> > > energy- WATSED.

> > >

> > > Foxtons are the worst of a rather awful

> bunch.

> >

> > Wat Graham26 sed.

>

>

> I get it HB!!! I get it. :)



ME TOO!! ME TOO!! (It took me a while though!:)))

woofmarkthedog

woofmarkthedog

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > > Absolutely brilliant. Low energy or not,

> its

> > > still

> > > > energy- WATSED.

> > > >

> > > > Foxtons are the worst of a rather awful

> > bunch.

> > >

> > > Wat Graham26 sed.

> >

> >

> > I get it HB!!! I get it. :)

>

>

> ME TOO!! ME TOO!! (It took me a while though!:)))

----------------------------------------------------------


Yeah, I'm fgikcnu* dyslexic & I get it.



Bitchin' down town!


WOoooo




W**F



* fucking

steveo

steveo

Posted
Posted

Damn, I wasn't expecting a polite response. How can I hate them now?


Dear Steve,


Thank you for your email, we are looking into this matter and I will

update you further next week.


Regards,

Rosie Nagle



------------------------------------

Rosie Nagle

PR Officer

Marketing, Foxtons


T: 020 7893 6343

M: 07773 816 312

F: 020 3249 4943

E: [email protected]

W: http://www.foxtons.co.uk

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So why should a buyer go through estate agent Z

> then?

>

> I don't think it works like that in practise. I

> wouldn't just pop into my "favourite" estate

> agents and ask them to show me what they've got.

> I'd pick a selection of properties online

> (regardless of the agent), and then ask to see

> those specific properties. If my favourite one was

> exclusively on the market with Foxtons, then I'd

> begrudgingly go through them.



Yes I agree Jeremy.


There are cheaper estate agents and there is also fixed fee private sales like Property Broker where you do not use an Estate Agent.

However selelrs who think they have saved money by either not paying an estate agent or paying a cheaper agent may well have achieved a lesser price for their property and whilst they have saved fees they may be worse off overall. In my experience as a buyer, estate agents create a market amongst interested parties and create a sense of insecurity in order to get the most money from the most keen buyer. The best agents are probably best at this.


Back to the lighting issue - it will be interesting to see Foxton's response to the letter, a softly worded "no" I imagine. If you guys succeed, well done but I suspect they spent a lot on researching this image and will stick with the frontage that has obviously cost so much money.

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> steveo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Here's their email [email protected].

> Bombard

> > it

>

>

> Done!

>

> Attn: The Manager

>

> I write to officially record my dismay over

> Foxtons' wasteful use of lighting at night.

> Moreover, at a time when many East Dulwich

> residents and businesses are rallying together in

> an attempt to reduce carbon emissions, I am

> appalled that a major player on Lordship Lane

> (i.e. yourselves) should display such a manifest

> disregard for our environment. Apart from the

> environmental concerns at stake here, I do not

> believe that Foxtons' actions can make business

> sense either.

>

> I would therefore request that Foxtons reflect

> upon their actions and, at the very least, REDUCE

> the amount of lighting left on at night.

>

> I would add that, being a homeowner, Foxtons'

> response to this request would have a major impact

> on whether or not I would choose to use Foxtons in

> the future.




BELOW IS REPLY FROM FOXTONS...will update the Forum when I receive a fuller reply.


"Thank you for your email, we are looking into this matter and I will update you further next week.




Regards,


Rosie Nagle"

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

AnotherPaul Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe leave the lights on?

>

> A passing jet just might mistake Foxtons for a

> runway and take out the top end of LL.

>

> Inadvertent carnage aside, in years to come this

> might be viewed as a blessing.

>

> ...

>

> I'll get my coat.



..the door's THAT way;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Sue · Posted

      Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Nya
      Recommendations - Mental Health/Illness

      By Nya · Posted

      Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • malumbu
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By malumbu · Posted

      @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...