Emily Maitlis' legs

[Ted Max]

"Possibly" Off-Topic but its like yesterday when myfriend, accidently, broke the microwave plate.

Was she handing you your arse on it at the time, Tony?

[Tony.London Suburbs]

Ted Max Wrote:

"Possibly" Off-Topic but its like yesterday when myfriend, accidently, broke the microwave plate. Was she handing you your arse on it at the time, Tony?

Still "polite and funny" at the same time Maxie.

Thats why you'll always be The Forum favourite...your certainly mine M8;-)

[annaj]

the fact that annaj CONTINUED reading DESPITE her assertion that she found the experience "really unpleasant" seems, to me anyway, a little unconvincing

Oh, honestly, Ladymuck, I can't believe I'm bothering to answer this, but since you seem to be implying that I either masochistically forced myself to repeatedly check a thread I didn't like, or that I'm lying and it didn't really offend me, but I reported it anyway, either of which would be frankly a bit bonkers, I feel compelled to respond.

Here's how it was: I kept an eye on the original thread, because I thought it was interesting, but I noticed it was starting to go down hill a bit. I then went away for a bit and did something else, you know life stuff, and later came back to look at the forum. I noticed there had been lots of activity on the thread, so I read through all the posts since I'd last read it. As I read them I was troubled by an increasing feeling that it all felt a bit wrong to me, so I posted to that effect and reported the posts to the moderator. Then I went away and got on with my life. That doesn't seem that unconvincing or weird to me.

Please, can you just accept that I, and others, think that on this occasion a joke went too far and get over it.

Now...

Surely then, it's all the fault of the women who buy these trashy mags

I know you were joking, but there may well be something in that.

But I'm only allowing myself and half hour lunch break before it's back to the books, so we'll have to discuss that one another time.

[Keef]

I think there probably is, but I really shouldn't using the forum in my new job, as still trying to create a good impression.

We'll delve deeper another time...

[RosieH]

I'd be interested in joining you for that debate, as I have serious concerns about magazines like Heat and Reveal and Closer and so on and on and on

But I am freelancing so need to do some actual work

And also, I need to do some actual work on my seeming (seems madam?) joylessness

[????]

I know not work ;-)

[RosieH]

bastard

[daizie]

What!? Celebrity gossip, that's what gets me up in the morning :)

[daizie]

P.s just to add, annaj it sounds like you might be in need of some of Leagle eagle's sessions ;-)

[bigbadwolf]

Good grief.

[Mick Mac]

BN5 enters stage left....

[Jah Lush]

daizie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > P.s just to add, annaj it sounds like you might be > in need of some of Leagle eagle's sessions.

That was uncalled for Daizie. Go and sit on the naughty step until further notice.

[Keef]

Besides, I suspect Anna knows all she needs to about physiology to be honest.

[bigbadwolf]

I bet she does. I wonder if she dresses up as a nur......

[Moos]

I agree, Daizie. Any woman that would prefer to see other women being selected for their jobs based on their qualifications rather than their tits clearly just needs a good seeing-to. Well said.

[Jeremy]

I think this thread has been blown out of proportion a little bit.

There is nothing new or controversial about a bunch of guys letching over female TV presenters, and teasing each other over their tastes. Women are no better, a lot of the time.

The real controversy is that there appears to be different selection criteria for male and female news readers.

[Muley]

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree, Daizie. Any woman that would prefer to

> see other women being selected for their jobs

> based on their qualifications rather than their

> tits clearly just needs a good seeing-to. Well

> said.

But Moos, surely for any woman going for a job as a 'Page 3 stunna' that's just confusing...

(though I suspect most 'Page 3 stunnas' would even find tying their shoelaces confusing).

[Moos]

In that case, their tits are very acceptable although I believe not complete qualifications.

[silverfox]

Emily Maitlis is lovely but I've noticed her ears are a bit too big. I've now switched my affections to the lovely Laura Tobin, the weather girl with the cheeky smile.

[Jeremy]

Silverfox... if we're going off topic and discussing weather presenters, I would nominate Lucy Verasamy.

[Muley]

But at the other end of the scale...Sian Lloyd!

[Muley]

Ooh look, it's coming up for the big one...

[Moos]

What big one?

[Muley]

Somewhere a mouse is twitching in anticipation...

[Moos]

100!!!