Jump to content

Things that East Dulwich needs to make it better


PeteOverhill

Recommended Posts

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dunno, if vegetarians had their way we'd be up

> to our necks in owls!!



But owls have no necks! (quoting someone from last night I think)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually that the thread in question has been moved to the lounge, which means we have free reign to get as chatty and off-topic as we like.


Except this one appears to still be in the general ED gossip room...



EDIT: beaten to it because it took time to linkify... you'd think there'd be some sort of intarnets phrase for this phenomenon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

na na na na na na


;-)


It does happen to perfectly good threads unfortunately - such are the perils of free-speech. I think it's might be because it covered similar ground to a previous thread that people were a tad flippant. I know that doesn't help people new to the forum but you can always find the original thread and resurrect it


Think this is the tail end of the previous version here:

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,14808,20044#msg-20044

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...