Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And so yet another event stolen from us with the

> help of Ali Barber!

> Pretty soon all entertainment will be canceled in

> East Dulwich!


I find this rude and, more dangerous, so ignorant of who is taking what important decisions in Southwark that will affect you and even London for your lifetime and beyond. If you want to chew on a council decision (better the person who made it) and an issue then do a search as to who controls what in Southwark. I'm sure you'll boil at the opportunities for anger over real hard money and building and decisions. Whether a cinema is too loud too late and too close to residences. really. And I love "Drive-Ins" with food and drink and lounging about under the night sky. Let's find a good place and go for it.

Decisions are not taken by a Person. They are decided by committees, Full Council and some delegated powers. There was a Consultation and Ali himself admits he helped get it cancelled by raising some problems. I have also posted on the appropriate committee members Local Forums. Lets hope Mr Barber manages to help get an event off the ground rather than cancelled next next time.

I didnt object I raised two issues that needed to be considered.


With all due respect the-e-dealer this thread is meant for more than just you and me to bicker.

You clearly object ot everything and anything I do. I'm one of the elected representative for East Dulwich ward - please let me serve all the residents of the ward and not just you via this forum.

Hi James,


I live next to a council owned property, 31 Shawbury Road, which has been abandoned for at least the last five years (since we moved in next door). Last month, the council kicked out squatters and covered all the entrances with metal sheeting. This has unfortunately attracted lots of flytippers, and has made it really unpleasant to live next door to the house. Incidentally, we are also trying to sell our house as we need to move out of London, but no one will touch ours with a ten foot pole while there is a dump in the front garden next door.

The street cleaning team have stated that they can't clear the rubbish as the front garden is private property and have said that they will contact the south housing team for assistance. It would be really great if I could understand who is actually responsible for cleaning up the rubbish in the garden, and if the council could regularly check the garden for more rubbish - since the council put up the sheeting that makes it clear that the house is abandoned, thus encouraging the unscrupulous to dump their rubbish there.

Additionally, it would be great to understand what the council plans to do with the house. Both our house and the neighbour on the other side have been impacted by the decay of the property and it would be comforting to know when we can expect the house to be repaired and occupied.

Thanks and regards

Victoria

I've just helped get some Council Tax casework resolved. They were beign taken to court needlessly. A number of emails were ignored from the resident to the council trying to sort it out.


Council officials have stated they have a massive backlog of Council Tax related emails.


If anyone has a Council Tax problem and been unable to make useful contact with council officials please do get in touch.

James


I have just gone on-line to order more of the kitchen waste recyling bags (little green jobbies) - the site says you can order them but the link only takes you through to a replacement bin ordering page. When I spoke to a helpful lady in Southwark recyling she told me that it isn't possible to order these on line, despite the misleading link on Southwark's site. She also told me (which might be helpful to other readers) that there was to be a general delivery of replacement bags sometime in September.


It would be good if the Southwark site could (1) not offer a link to replacement bags when it doesn't allow on-line re-ordering and (2) perhaps could let people know on-line of the intended mass delivery of bags - that way we could avoid wasting operative time.


Web sites are only useful if they are accurate and kept up-to-date.


The page offering the non-existant bag re-ordering service is here http://www.southwark.gov.uk/a_to_z/service/362/recycling_bags_and_boxes

Hi P68,

That's really useful and thanks for pointing it out.

I'll try and get this fixed. Quite complicated to fix as they've repeated the mistake through the process. Hopefully it wont take long.


Hi RotR,

Many thanks for this - that's what we did in my house and it also worked a treat.

Hi James


I should have added to my recycle bag post that the Southwark lady did offer to process my request for more bags, but when I knew there was to be a general September delivery I found that acceptable. In the past I too have had next day delivery when I have requested more.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just helped get some Council Tax casework

> resolved. They were beign taken to court

> needlessly. A number of emails were ignored from

> the resident to the council trying to sort it

> out.

>

> Council officials have stated they have a massive

> backlog of Council Tax related emails.

>

> If anyone has a Council Tax problem and been

> unable to make useful contact with council

> officials please do get in touch.


Thank you very much James.


Px

Needle Exchange and Pharmacy - there will be a public meeting at the ED Community Centre re this organised by Jonathan Mitchell - I cannot remember the time so will put up another post tomorrow.

Gumboots Nursery have been informed and they will be notifying their parents etc.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If anyone has a Council Tax problem and been

> unable to make useful contact with council

> officials please do get in touch.


Hi James,


I have a problem with the letter I've just received fom Southwark about the Council Tax single person discount review which requires me to sign and return a declaration that I am still entitled to the discount, does not enclose an envelope to return it in and threatens that my discount may be cancelled if I do not return the form within 14 days.


Is this genuine or a wind-up of some kind???

I have a problem with the letter I've just received fom Southwark about the Council Tax single person discount review which requires me to sign and return a declaration that I am still entitled to the discount, does not enclose an envelope to return it in and threatens that my discount may be cancelled if I do not return the form within 14 days.


Is this genuine or a wind-up of some kind???

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


I have received the same letter, and I think that if Capita, which is the company, that is asking for the information, for the Council, seeing as they want to check the information every year, that they already have, they should be supplying the stamped addressed envelopes?. Capita is earning millions of pounds from our taxes, housing benefits? and Council taxes, it seem like they are doing what the Government is doing, cutting back on everything, to save the government money whilst having the lion?s share of the cut backs. How the rich get richer down to the poor.

It's surely simple economics - Capita would have charged out to the council the cost of the return envelope - so (all) council tax payers would have picked up the bill. The council tax concession on single occupancy has to be worth a great deal more than the cost of a stamp and envelope to continue claiming it. The council needs documentary evidence (a signature) if the claim turns out to be innacurate (more than one person living at the property) which does happen.

penguin68


Thats right Capita have chatged the Council for the stamps and envelopes and we have all paid for them, so why should pensioners

pay for them, and poor people, its mainly pensioners that live on there own.

Capita have the contracts for Housing and Council tax, which in turn costs us twice as much as if the Councils was running them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...