Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi chazzle,

Yes, my understanding is demolition of the previous building and placing hoarding and undertaking drilling would constitute starting the scheme.

As I explained earlier the developer has applied to straighten the proposed structure to make it cheaper to produce - when I asked them about this it was to obtain relief from the high construction cost inflation.

Yes, it is now 11 years since I originally attend the public appeal objecting to the then proposed design and then seperately proposed to the then developer that they incorporate a new library into the building.

James,


I have posted a message on the Railway Rise discussion about the new planning application to build a three-storey extension on the back of two of the cottages.


Can you confirm that, although the consultation period has begun, the planning documents have yet to be loaded: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?casereference=16/AP/1341&system=DC


It is clearly not acceptable to lose a week off the consultation.

Hi Azalea,

Please see - http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2013/04/15/gp-complaints-and-praise-how-to/


Summarised as:

Since 1 April 2013 to make complaints about NHS health care:


If you have a comment or a complaint about a GP, dentist, pharmacy or optician contact the London office of NHS England at [email protected]. You can also contact NHS England on 0300 311 22 33. There is more information available at http://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/complaint

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Azalea,

> Please see -

> http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2013/04/15/

> gp-complaints-and-praise-how-to/

>

> Summarised as:

> Since 1 April 2013 to make complaints about NHS

> health care:

>

> If you have a comment or a complaint about a GP,

> dentist, pharmacy or optician contact the London

> office of NHS England at

> [email protected]. You can also contact

> NHS England on 0300 311 22 33. There is more

> information available at

> http://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/complaint


Thank you. Have you heard of any surgeries not referring patients to outpatients clinics in order to save money but not telling you, despite agreeing to? Not sure how budgets work in regard to this?

pebs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi James, what's happening about the Southwark

> Spine cycle route? Long time no hear ...


I would be interested in this, too. And, while we're there, what is the status of the Elephant & Castle to Crystal Palace Quietway? Plenty of consultations last year, but not much seems to be actually happening.

James Barber Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

>

> Hi Mrs D,

> No update yet. But a recent study really points to

> how after school clubs can make a material

> difference for poorer kids overall education

> results. So keen we see more. The recent research

> might encourage schools to use some pupil premium

> to make more happen.


Hi James -


Is there anyone else I could contact in order to get an answer In regards to the overall Southwark strategy (and indeed east Dulwich) to after school care? I am well aware of any benefits so more interested in a practical solution.....

Hello James


There are a number of shops either boarded up or with repossession notices posted, could Southwark be asked to intervene to encourage new life well before we reach a tipping point. Some have been derelict for at least 5 years (e.g. Threshers).


On a similar note, is there scope to do more at the North Cross Road Market? I heard rumours of picnic / trestle tables with more road closures to encourage more food traders.


Thank you.

Hi James


I started a thread about Motorbike crime in the area, as this seems to be a real problem at the moment. Would you mind taking a look as I would be interested to hear your take on the issue and whether the council is aware of the seriousness of the issue.


Thanks

John

Hi mrsilencio,

The offer of free ground motorbike anchors is still in place for all East Dulwich ward residents - any resident can email with their details so we can organise this.

We also have free motorbike property marking kits - again any resident can email me their contact details and we can get this organised.


I will ask our Safer Neighbourhood Panel Ward Panel to make motorbike crime number one priority. The Police can get a list of all registered motorbikes in the ward and proactively visit offering our free anchors and property marking kits. I will also contact the borough commander asking what other measures he plans to solve this problem.

Hi ruffers,

Around October time the next round of Cleaner, Greener, Safer funding will be open for applications.

Get in touch and I'll guide you through completing the paperwork - anonymously. I have even persuaded Labour councillors about applications, filled the forms in for them and successfully applied in there names in the past - no names. So I've lots of practice.

Upland road pavement closure close to Crystal Palace Road.


Council officers have responded to me:


"

Dear Councillor Barber



Thank you for your enquiry dated 13/05/2016, in which you requested information regarding the following: The ongoing footway closure on Upland Road.I can now provide you with a full response to your enquiry.


We share your frustration regarding the footway remaining closed, and I can assure you that we do not approve footway closures without justification.

In addition to our regular inspections I have visited the site with our Traffic Manager Ian Law. We have made it very clear that we want to footway open as soon as possible. The developer has stated that their program has fallen behind several times and they are extremely keen to clear site as soon as they possibly can. We cannot open the footway until it is safe to do so. If we forcefully have the scaffold removed we are left in the position of having an incomplete building that cannot be finished without further footway closures at some point in the future. Due to the proximity of the build to the narrow footway it has not been possible to have a usable width at any point during demolition or construction. The other option available to us was to have a temporary barriered footway located in the carriageway. This was deemed unsafe due to the narrow carriageway and position of the walkway in relation to the junction. In addition, we would not approve a temporary footway that would push pedestrians across an access point for construction vehicles.


The developer has requested that the licence was extended beyond the point we have granted it for. We will not issue it for long periods because we want to keep pressure on them to finish.

In the meantime we have asked that site hoarding closest to the junction of Crystal Palace Road is moved inwards to improve visibility at the pedestrian crossing that has been kept open throughout the works.


In addition, we have denied another developer across the road any licences at all until the works on 97 Crystal Palace Road are finished. We also managed out the need for any footway closure for another development on the opposite side of the road.

"


I;ve asked why line in the sand have they expressed to the developer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...