Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would anyone agree that it would be a great idea to have a couple of hours a day,(regulated),buggy free in lordship lane!Just imagine being able to walk freely along the pavement,go in to the shops without a buggy jam!Any buggy pusher flouting the 2 hour period would have thier buggy confiscated,(on the first offence),then, if they buy another one,a more severe punishment!What d'ya think?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8245-buggyland-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

Ha ha, brilliant. Ban the buggies! I think you're onto something. Inspirational stuff. Let's meet up, I think I love you. Can I bring my mum? No? Your mum? Fair enough.


Buggies. Ban them. Awesome. Two hours! Not enough.


9-11 People (idiots) with buggies

11-1 The retired, those requiring assistance, the halt and the lame

1-3 People in work clothes, muddy boots and no shirts

3-5 Lone females, key workers and pizza delivery boys

5-12 Stubbly men in Gap jeans, sunglasses and lager. And their molls.

I know how annoying it is being held up behind a sea of buggies but now find myself a mum too and therefore one of those annoying people on the paths :-$ We need our buggies to carry the heavy babes, vast changing bags and heavy shopping bags so spare a thought for us too! We're already self conscious of this and the hostility and general irritation from people (without little ones) around us isn't very pleasant during an already (usually) stressful day. I'm sure most mums would LOVE not to have to drag a buggy around. I propose a separate 'buggy lane'??? :))
And why is it that only people with buggies have no manners? All of them mind, not just one or two people, but all of them, whoever they are, wheverever they go, all time. Always. Everywhere. I've never ever met another person or category of persons who ever forgets their manners ever. Every other type of human being I have ever met on Lordship Lane has always been charm personified.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shouldn?t you folks be tending your offspring and

> not posting nonsense on here? I think one of them

> is busy trying to break into my house.



Spikes on buggy wheels don't pay for themselves you know. My kid found your porn collection btw. Sicko.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
    • Nope, I'd just get on with my day and forget about it. And I wouldn't report them on the basis that they might spill my coffee in the future.  However the OP seems to think that this young woman is deliberately pushing her bell, slamming her gate etc, having repeatedly been asked not to. I'd wager the woman is a bit pee'd off and there's a bit of a stand-off going on. Best course of action is to go out, take the parcel, smile sweetly, say hello, tell her you hope she's having a nice day / staying cool etc, in a way that comes across as genuine and not pass-agg,  and to let it diffuse. Might find it calms down a bit.  But I like the girl hate the idea of her being denigrated on here when she works so hard. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...