Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A commentator should simply report the facts as they are happening. So all we should hear from his mouth are statistics, phases of play, incidents, summarys and updates. He gets right up my nose when he starts pontificating on players and managers' decisions. Moan.....moan.....moan. He sounds like a poor man's Ian Paisley.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-254955
Share on other sites

You are a right whinger Davy! ;-)


I agree, about Alan Green, he is very negative.


I have asked myself many times however why he is in the job he is in and the answer comes from the commentary on key football matters.


When Radio5 build up a match they play old clips and Alan Green's key ability to describe what has happened in pressure moments is key, for example the MU win over Bayern Munich to win the European Cup in injury time.


I don't like the guy, but I try to be fair and R5 give him the last quarter of key games because he deilvers under pressure.


Its always important to put both sides of the argument so although i don't like the guy, I feel I have worked out why Radio5 rate him so highly - next time you are on the edge of your seat, try to intelligently communicate what you are watching, then you will realise where AG's skill lies.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-254969
Share on other sites

I quite like him for his opinions. I don't want to listen to people being neutral for the sake of not upsetting anyone. Fact is he is a Liverpool fan from what I understand. I think radio commentry should be about getting across the events on the field and I much prefer someone giving an opinion than just being polite.I think AG is good at his job even if you don't like him.


PS Why the BBC chose Motty over Barry Davies I will never know. Davies was a much better commentator.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255106
Share on other sites

Dear Alan Green (and other radio commentators - but mainly Alan Green).


Here is a list of things I couldn't giveafuckabout.


1. The traffic on the M6.

2. How close you could park your enormous arse to the ground

3. If there is some small part of the field you have to crane your fat neck to see.

4. If a female runner has brought you a coffee and a doughnut yet

5. How cold it is where you are sitting.

6. If "United are playing left to right" as you look at it

7. If the man in front of you occasionally gets to his feet

8. How late it will be before you get home


Yours,


T. Max

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255477
Share on other sites

Lawrenson used to be a lot more critical of Liverpool, but according to my sources he told them it was to safeguard his job. So many ex-Liverpool in the national media but it's probably only Thommo on Sky who is really biased.


Alan Green may have his critics, but there are also a lot of commentators who dig the knife into Liverpool at every turn such as Mark Bright, Craig Burley and Gary Linekar. I know they're all no marks but still not happy when it's so often baseless!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255592
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...