Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A commentator should simply report the facts as they are happening. So all we should hear from his mouth are statistics, phases of play, incidents, summarys and updates. He gets right up my nose when he starts pontificating on players and managers' decisions. Moan.....moan.....moan. He sounds like a poor man's Ian Paisley.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-254955
Share on other sites

You are a right whinger Davy! ;-)


I agree, about Alan Green, he is very negative.


I have asked myself many times however why he is in the job he is in and the answer comes from the commentary on key football matters.


When Radio5 build up a match they play old clips and Alan Green's key ability to describe what has happened in pressure moments is key, for example the MU win over Bayern Munich to win the European Cup in injury time.


I don't like the guy, but I try to be fair and R5 give him the last quarter of key games because he deilvers under pressure.


Its always important to put both sides of the argument so although i don't like the guy, I feel I have worked out why Radio5 rate him so highly - next time you are on the edge of your seat, try to intelligently communicate what you are watching, then you will realise where AG's skill lies.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-254969
Share on other sites

I quite like him for his opinions. I don't want to listen to people being neutral for the sake of not upsetting anyone. Fact is he is a Liverpool fan from what I understand. I think radio commentry should be about getting across the events on the field and I much prefer someone giving an opinion than just being polite.I think AG is good at his job even if you don't like him.


PS Why the BBC chose Motty over Barry Davies I will never know. Davies was a much better commentator.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255106
Share on other sites

Dear Alan Green (and other radio commentators - but mainly Alan Green).


Here is a list of things I couldn't giveafuckabout.


1. The traffic on the M6.

2. How close you could park your enormous arse to the ground

3. If there is some small part of the field you have to crane your fat neck to see.

4. If a female runner has brought you a coffee and a doughnut yet

5. How cold it is where you are sitting.

6. If "United are playing left to right" as you look at it

7. If the man in front of you occasionally gets to his feet

8. How late it will be before you get home


Yours,


T. Max

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255477
Share on other sites

Lawrenson used to be a lot more critical of Liverpool, but according to my sources he told them it was to safeguard his job. So many ex-Liverpool in the national media but it's probably only Thommo on Sky who is really biased.


Alan Green may have his critics, but there are also a lot of commentators who dig the knife into Liverpool at every turn such as Mark Bright, Craig Burley and Gary Linekar. I know they're all no marks but still not happy when it's so often baseless!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8268-alan-green/#findComment-255592
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
    • I can't find any references to an attack on a British base. where do you find one?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...