Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lol, what you on about? I at least wait until they've left school!


By the way that was supposed to be 'what are your ambitions' not amnitions.



Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Skids, you look nice enough and seem to like

> > animals, but what are your amnitions for when

> you

> > leave school?

>

> *splutters*..Legal Eagle - of all the people to

> utter such a comment! Tsk!

>

> But am I the only one who imagined someone

> completely different to have a moniker of Skids?

> You look so wholesome darling.

Lol, what you on about? I at least wait until they've left school!


By the way that was supposed to be 'what are your ambitions' not amnitions.



Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Skids, you look nice enough and seem to like

> > animals, but what are your amnitions for when

> you

> > leave school?

>

> *splutters*..Legal Eagle - of all the people to

> utter such a comment! Tsk!

>

> But am I the only one who imagined someone

> completely different to have a moniker of Skids?

> You look so wholesome darling.

SteveT, I had to question my Freudian dyslexia and re-read your last word for I could've sworn it said "coverage" which sets a whole different colour to your remark!


Here's me on release from Guantanamo, obviously the authorities' racial profiling policy had gone a little awry. They are "terribly" sorry and flew me home by way of compensation (granted they dropped me off at the other end without landing).

Ok, Tog, you look like a bit of an action man, and not bad looking either, so please complete the following checklist:


- can hold down a job

- isn't addicted to any chemical substances

- knows how to cook

- isn't a woman beater

- Hasn't got a gambling problem

- own hair and teeth

> - can hold down a job.... CHECK!

> - isn't addicted to any chemical substances.... CHECK! (unless you count alcohol)

> - knows how to cook.... CHECK! (you should taste my enchiladas...mmmm)

> - isn't a woman beater.... CHECK! (apart from the occasional bottom smack....)

> - Hasn't got a gambling problem.... CHECK! (as long as I'm winning)

> - own hair and teeth.... CHECK! (what's left of them)


Not that I'm applying for the post, of course!;-)

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok, Tog, you look like a bit of an action man, and

> not bad looking either, so please complete the

> following checklist:

>

> - can hold down a job

> - isn't addicted to any chemical substances

> - knows how to cook

> - isn't a woman beater

> - Hasn't got a gambling problem

> - own hair and teeth



I own hair and teeth - but I leave them beside the bed each night - is that ok?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then do I agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...