Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually Legal isn't it rather like discovering anything bad (horrific/strange) about someone you thought you knew? Remember Sonia Sutcliffe? She found out she was married to a mass murderer and swore blind she never knew. I suppose it's possible that she didn't. What about finding out that the nice old man down the road is a war criminal? There's a great scene in The Sopranos when the daughter explains to her younger brother what dad actually did for a living (not waste management).

I wasn't implying anything Mick, I was saying that if DM or anyone else has experienced abuse at the hanfs of the Catholic church, it would be wrong to expect the victims not to want to express their anger about their abusers.


GG that is an interesting trail of thought. If you are surrounded by a norm of behaviour that is abusive and sick, it would probably take a strong person not to be influenced by that norm especially if their resistance caused them to become an outcast.

Legal i thought you were suggesting monica had in some way chosen to ignore the issue or the victims rights to express their anger. I think lots of catholics are ashamed that this has happened but that they remain loyal to the values of the church despite the shameful actions of many priests and nuns who have let themselves and the church down. I think DM on the other hand had a personal axe to grind and i thought she was insensitive towards monica. Im not a fan of the catholic church but i do have sympathy when someone is picked upon unfairly.
Mick, what do you think the values of the church are exactly? My recollection of them in brief is that you do as we say and go to heaven, you don't and you go to hell! I think DM wrote as she saw and be it insensitive towards someone else or not she is entitled to air her views. I don't think that if those views are directly opposed to someone else's it should be considered that the latter is being picked on.

Declan - I no longer concern myself with what the values of the catholic church are - but Monica seems a nice person and she believes the church has value in her life.


Whilst I am in DM's camp on the issues raised and am a firm non believer in God or any religion, I think some issues should be approached with a little more diplomacy. I would not want DM speaking to my mother either in the way she has posted on this thread.


Whilst my mother, as an example, would accept that there are many wrongdoers in the Catholic church, she would believe that overall it is a force for good. Its very difficult for some people to set aside hundreds of years of teaching that has formed part of their families' beliefs and habits for generations, from cradle to grave.


My mother for example, still prays for me.


My 7 year old daughter on the other hand, does not know what a prayer is.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was not picking on Monica. I simply do not

> understand why some people refuse to believe the

> evidence in front of them, and I don't see any

> point in arguing with fanatics.



DM Im not a fanatic, just a firm believer in being respectful and diplomatic to my fellow man. You may believe my family are fanatics and good luck with that, however I was brought up to respect others, listen to my elders and always treat others how I would like to be treated.

Declan you have made your point and thanks again, but I have come to understand that no matter what you say on this forum, DM always wins.

Monica,


The forum is not a single entity; we are all capable of reading a thread and drawing our own conclusions. Isn't that the whole point? Of course it's rather difficult in this case because DM has deleted her original posts. Nevertheless, we all have our own opinions and there are no winners or losers.

No, I don't think so. DM was perfectly within her right to express her disgust in the way she saw things but at the same time there was no need for the condescending way she replied to Monica. Having said that I also think it's a cop out that she's deleted her earlier posts.

Sean Thanks for the comment, Im sorry you misundersood the comment. I do feel that the forum is actually quite clicky at times so because DM is well loved and liked, i understand why she can get away with most of the comments she posts. I actually thought she was funny, but this thread has revealed a pretty viscious side to her, which I am sure we all have time to time.

Gigirl I know you are not a single entity, and I apologise if you took my post in the wrong way, however again I feel that I have been ganged up against and its put me off posting on the lounge. Shame really, I will stick to the community stuff and not bother with my opinions.

Sorry mon but in have met you as often as dm. Ie not often


I don't see as she got away with anything on here. If anything vince was far more vile to her in a post now removed.


She has also removed her posts and whatever your feelings about what she said about you it's fairly obvious to anyone Reading that she appers far more hurt than you. Which isn't to say I agree with all if the comments aimed in your direction by her


on top of that most of the supportive posts on here have been for you not her


so again, not only do I not understand your claim if her winning but also take issue with your subsequent claims

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As in life, there are people who never back down

> in an arguement, people on the forum are no

> different. Could that be all that Monica is

> saying?


Mick your 'rescue' of Monica from the beast that is DM is admirable up to a point. You started the thread with an attack of people with 'blind faith' which I presume you would think includes by definition, Monica. You must a a sore bum sitting on that fence!


PS Am prepared to retract last sentence if taken as being offensive.

Monica, don't be put off by posting on here or anywhere else in The Lounge for that matter. I think you'll find that the "witty persona" Dulwichmum adopts is what makes her popular on here but when on the rare occasion she steps out of that character then the real person underneath is revealed, which turns out from her postings on this thread isn't so nice after all. Having said that I can fully understand her anger if DM or any other members of her family have been subjected to such abuse but she certainly hasn't done herself any favours on this thread by some of her remarks. Hence the deletion of her earlier "vicious" posts which I'm sure she isn't too proud of.

monica Wrote:

> ....however again I feel that I have been ganged up

> against and its put me off posting on the lounge.

> Shame really, I will stick to the community stuff

> and not bother with my opinions.




Doesn't the fact that a fellow forumite feels like this tell us something about our own behaviour? No forumite should be made to feel that his/her opinions are worthless - and Monica's are as valid as anybody else's. This forum is about inclusivity, not the reverse.

I've never met DM; I've met very few forumites. I don?t go to drinks (I might go tomorrow because it?s Christmas but I probably won?t). I do find the 'clique' accusation that frequently arises completely tedious. Most people on the forum are intelligent so I think if they disagreed with DM or anyone else they would say so (and they are saying so).


I?ve read this thread (minus DM?s deleted posts of course) and I?m really not seeing anything that justifies your statement ?I feel that I have been ganged up against?. Obviously there?s been a big war of words with DM but I haven?t read her posts so how can I comment on what took place? From reading everyone else?s posts I?m honestly not seeing you as someone who has been ganged up on, or evidence of a clique closing ranks. If I?m honest I feel frustrated that you say you won?t post in the lounge any more because of this episode.


I do think you?ve made your point now about DM and I think it?s time that everyone moved on.

I understand that this forum is inclusive, but I don't understand where Monica is coming from at all. As Sean points out, most of what is written on this thread is supportive of Monica, but still she says that she feels intimidated by my support - I don't see it. When she thanks Mickmac for his support, she says "I hope your wife is ok with this comment". I thought that we were able to debate and chat openly on this forum. Monica will be slapping men with a fan next. This is all a bit Victorian.


This thread started out by outlining the dangers of blind faith, and I completely agree. This forum is not a clique, I think that the day it becomes one, no-one will bother with it. We enjoy a lively debate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This may be somewhat out of date but virtually no environmental benefit & almost entirely grass... really? https://www.gigl.org.uk/sinc/sobi09/ Description Peckham Rye was established as an open space in the late 19th century and includes several valuable habitat features spread across the park. The park is a Grade II Listed landscape, and has recently been restored with assistance from the Heritage Lottery Fund. A small community garden within the site is managed by the Friends of Peckham Rye. Peckham Rye Park won a Green Flag Award again for 2022. The site is used by the Southwark Health Walks project as part of a Walking the Way to Health (WHI) scheme. Wildlife This large park has several valuable habitat features. The most important of these is the only remaining above-ground section of the River Peck and the most natural stream in the borough. The stream is heavily shaded by native, unmanaged wet woodland dominated by alder, ash and pedunculated oak with a ground cover of pendulous sedge and bramble. Alder dominated woodland is a rare habitat in Southwark. Although somewhat altered with weirs, other artificial structures and ornamental planting, some sections are still in their natural banks and includes yellow flag, watercress, water figwort and cuckooflower. The largest of three ponds supports marginal vegetation including hemp agrimony. A variety of waterfowl nest on the wooded island, including tufted duck, coot, Canada goose and mallard. Substantial flocks of gulls visit the park in winter and bats are likely to forage over the water. Small blocks of predominantly native woodland, mostly on the boundary between the Park and the Common, are dominated by oak and ash with a well-developed understory, but sparse ground flora. Spring bulbs have been planted in previous years. These and several dense shrubberies support a good bird population and small numbers of pipistrelle bats are present. Infrequently mown grassland is located in one large area and was seeded in 2009. It's composition includes giant fescue, ladies bedstraw, meadowsweet, black knapweed and wild carrot. The rest of the park consists of amenity grassland with some fine mature trees.  
    • Same here. Incredibly selfish behaviour. Also illegal.
    • I heard them & our two dogs were extremely upset by it..  bad enough during the evenings but at least can have music on to dilute the noise!   Some people have literally zero thoughts for others!! 
    • I have signed that petition.  Someone was letting off loud fireworks at about 3 am this morning. They woke me up.   I don’t know where they were exactly but it sounded like they were in the vicinity of Dog Kennel Hill.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...