Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I, on the other hand, thought the Jonathan Ross show was at times, fantastic.


I'm not sure he recovered from the Sachs affair and on his return it went downhill.


Before all that he interviewed Jay Z and at the end of the interview you could hear Jay Z say "They told me you were good man - but I did not expect you to be that good".


He brought something different out of his guests and the US guests in particular, who you could see, sat down to go through the motions but soon realised this would be a very different intereview.


Graham Norton is really good too but a different style. Chris Evans I can't stand.

When I heard that Rossy and Norton and Madonna were on vast salaries, I thought it was about time the Beeb was turned upside down and shaken, just to see what would fall out of it's pockets.


They are financed heavily via the extortionate licence fee and yet produce relatively few programmes. The money goes into the wrong pockets, not into the coffers of the talented.

Steve,

You need to put the likes JR's salary (6 million / year) in the context of the BBCs annual budget (in excess of 4+ Billions / year). It's meaningless.. and getting shot of him solely to pander to some crowd-pleasing notion of cost-cutting is equally meaningless. All it means in the long run is that more people will have to suck Rupert Murdoch off in order to watch people they want to see.


It wasn't so long ago that the BBC 'did sport' and now we just accept that they don't. Instead, nowadays half the population simply bend over like lambs to be shafted up the butt by Murdoch every time they want to see a ball kicked.


What do you consider as current 'telvision talent' anyway? Give us a list. Be sure that for every 'worthless' programmes you'd like to be shot of, there will be a dozen that you consider 'favourites' that I would like to see blasted out of existence.

I liked the chat show too, but I did have the feeling that it had run its course during the last series. The guest roll-call was tired and repetitive (I'm sure some of them had been on less than a year prior?) and Wossy sometimes struggled to keep things moving - but that's down to a decline in and tiredness of the format itself as much as anything.


I thought that one of the most interesting interviews was (look away now, those easily offended) was Ross and Chris Evans, which was notably sparky and genuinely interesting in comparison to many others.


Of course it was simply wonderful when Parky 'did' Ali and blah blah blah, but television is (thankfully) an evolving medium and nothing stays the same. I enjoy seeing archive stuff but PLEASE no more wheeling Tony Curtis out AGAIN to hear the same stuff over and over and over and over.

*Bob* - I think Wossy himself put his own salary into context at the British Comedy Awards in 2007 when news of his ?18 million pay package came out close to the time that the BBC said it was cutting hundreds of jobs in its newsroom. Wossy said he was ``worth a thousand BBC journalists.''



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Steve,

> You need to put the likes JR's salary (6 million /

> year) in the context of the BBCs annual budget (in

> excess of 4+ Billions / year). It's meaningless..

> and getting shot of him solely to pander to some

> crowd-pleasing notion of cost-cutting is equally

> meaningless. All it means in the long run is that

> more people will have to suck Rupert Murdoch off

> in order to watch people they want to see.

>

> It wasn't so long ago that the BBC 'did sport' and

> now we just accept that they don't. Instead,

> nowadays half the population simply bend over like

> lambs to be shafted up the butt by Murdoch every

> time they want to see a ball kicked.

>

> What do you consider as current 'telvision talent'

> anyway? Give us a list. Be sure that for every

> 'worthless' programmes you'd like to be shot of,

> there will be a dozen that you consider

> 'favourites' that I would like to see blasted out

> of existence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
    • Second time Aria has completed a plumbing job for me and both times he’s been polite. Communicative, kept to time and completed the job. He’s very helpful and tidy as well. First job was ball valve in water tank, not easy at all. He and his team were fantastic. This time kitchen tap cylinders replaced and tap tightened.  Much appreciated, Aria thank you.
    • Thought others may be interested to help a local community centre help others.    My bank account offers roundup and it’s been growing all year. As well as treating myself or putting it towards a train ticket to see my family I’ve made a donation to the Albrighton. They can use donations at any time but I hope my donation will go towards the Christmas hampers.    Can you support them so they can provide Christmas hampers?   https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/albrightoncommunityfridge?utm_id=1&utm_term=M22JKQb6W   A donation of £50 will pay for a hamper to feed a family over this Christmas period. A donation of £30 will pay for a hamper to feed someone living on their own over the Christmas period.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...