Jump to content

Recommended Posts

She's been given a 'new' job to get the olympics done. Because a 7 billion overspend was doing a pretty good job of it wasn't it!!

At least John Reid's gone, nowt for Hazel Blears and Ruth Kelly in transport hopefully can't do too much damage there.

Nice to see most of the ultra blairites gone.

Milliband as foreign secretary is an interesting one, but seeing as Blair effectively made that a spokesman's role, will be interesting to see how that develops. Is Brown effectively handing control back to the foreign office but keeping the blair camp stink around it so he can distance himself from all those foreign policy disasters?

That or that was the deal that was struck for Milliband not to stand for leader and split the party in two.


*aaagh, just spotted Blears has the community post, whatever that means *

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24836
Share on other sites

Well I know 3 people who have emailed or written to her and never had a reply so that would suggest a backlog, unless she has never had any intention of answering them in which case I guess it doesn't count as a backlog.

I do know someone who got a reply but it was a - insert name standard letter which didn't actually answer his enquiry.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24856
Share on other sites

To be fair, we ravaged their women and pillaged their country for a few hundred years....they're just doing it back now. Have you not seen Braveheart? Just be glad we no longer have to let our wives sleep with the Lord of the Manor on your wedding night! Can't see too many women being thrilled with the prospect of ol' Gordy winking at them with his good eye before having "neo-endogenous growth" and his wicked way.


::o

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24889
Share on other sites

To be fair Driot-de-Seigneur was just something your Norman ruling class type exercised over whomsoever he ruled, be he Saxon, Celt or Pict. Braveheart has about as much historical accuracy as the dodgy dossier; it's useful only to pump up Scotsmen before a football game against the English that they'll probably lose anyway.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24898
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair Driot-de-Seigneur was just something

> your Norman ruling class type exercised over

> whomsoever he ruled, be he Saxon, Celt or Pict.

> Braveheart has about as much historical accuracy

> as the dodgy dossier; it's useful only to pump up

> Scotsmen before a football game against the

> English that they'll probably lose anyway.


erm......What happened the last time England & Scotland met ?


last ever home international at the old wemberlee

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24904
Share on other sites

You can keep your meaningless friendlies.


I may have to mention that penalty miss and that goal.

My mate phoned me up from a pub in Annan at half time informing me how we were going to be drubbed and how they had all been watching braveheart all morning.


So confident was he that he gave me the phone number of the pub (pre mobile days) in case he forgot to gloat after the game I should ring him so he could pile on the abuse.


Strangely the landlord could find noone of his description frantically waving that he didn't want to speak in the pub after the game?!?


Anyway, Miss Jowell...never answers her phone either...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/981-tessa/#findComment-24908
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...