yeknomyeknom

Do you have a fox proof portable coop?

Very helpful. Thankyou. SueJ Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi All, > > We are running a reverse advent calendar at work > from the 1st to 12th December for Southwark > Foodbank and are happy to take in donations from > others if it is helpful. > > If you would like to contribute we are accepting > donations on the following dates and times; > > Tuesday, 5th & 12th December, fifty seven, 57 > North Cross Road from 9am to 1pm > > Wednesday, 6th & 13th December, Suzanne James HQ, > 11B Barry Road from 9am to 5pm (also at other > times if our shutters are up please just hand > items in to our staff). > > Urgently Needed Items Include: > > Tinned fruit (400g) > Coffee > Rice (500g) > UHT Milk (1L) > Rice Pudding > Non-Pork Meat > Toiletries > > Please don't donate Beans or Sugar, which they > have plenty of. > > We will be delivering our collection to Pecan on > Peckham High Street on Friday, 15th December. > > Best wishes, Suzanne > Suzanne James Ltd

Pecan don?t accept drop ins. You have to contact them to make an appointment. They told me that today.

At least scooters are noisy. Now if I hear one, night or day, I check myself and keep very mindful.

We have lived in both areas. PR offers a much better to commute to nearly everywhere. Especially at night.

You sound very reasonable. Also you sound correct.

Spelled. intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ok ,I've cracked . > > Trinidad could you edit the thread title sothat > there is spelt their .Which is no doubt what you > intended .

I love it but would have foregone the private garage for more garden or another room.

When I went last year, they explained that only the three surrounding streets worth of children get in.

Hi, Find out when anopen day is and turn up. They didn't turn us away. The Xmas fair will be soonish so make sure you go to that also.

The worry will be if it will be cleaned each morning. Cats, dogs and foxes love a bit of sand.

The worst is parents outside schools. They sit waiting to drop off or collect and keep the car running in the summer for air con or winter for heat. Meanwhile filling their child's lungs with pollution.

Loving them

Thanks, I'm not worried about that bit. Dmummy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do not know the retention requirements for > health documents but if they are still available, > unless they are your records it's unlikely that > you will be able to access sensitive personal > information without obtaining legal advice.

My heart certainly goes out to him. It really does. Nonetheless he starts drinking quite early and gets very rowdy. It's very intimidating for my young child and his new spot outside the park isn't great for the young families going in and out.

Unfortunately it was 30 years ago and we have no idea of hospital only a guess of 2 boroughs. Thanks for all thoughts. Looks like we might be out of luck.

Here are some ideas which may or may not suit based on varying budgets. You don't know if your wife or you will feel happy to leave your baby so best to stick close to home. Use Perfect 10 mobile beauty. It's very well respected, reasonably priced and they offer spa treatments on your home which I think is key. You can book in a massage but if on the day your wife decides she would prefer a different treatment. The staff tend to be multi skilled and able to change it up. Buy a good DVD boxset or subscription to Netflix. I can recommend Scandal boxset. Me and my two sisters all enjoyed with newborns. There will be lots of long nights where she has to stay up potentially to feed the baby. Often this involves time on a phone or mobile device browsing whilst baby feeds. Check out Readly online. It's a way to subscribe to all magazines online and is actually a significantly cheaper way to read mags than the paper versions. I would recommend Grazia. Make your own home spa for her. Buy a cheap foot spa from Argos, a sheet face mask which are all the rage (cult beauty is a good site for inspiration), you can buy sleep massage masks, hand masks, essential oils and creams and give her a full treatment yourself. You could get a jar and some colourful post it notes. On each one write a lovely memory or compliment and fold it into the jar. Tell her you know there will be hard days ahead and if it gets a bit much to select a note to read in the hopes of lifting her spirits up. Make a mix tape for her to listen to that reminds her how much you know her and love her. Music is easy to listen to with a baby. On that note, how about a Spotify subscription? Also an Alexa Dot to play it on. To be honest the way you have described her in your post would make her smile and happy. Don't forget just writing something nice can be a lovely gift in itself.

When you don't have a mobile phone you come quite familiar with the local pay phones. There aren't a lot but they do exist. There is often a phone in the door of supermarkets, some traditional pubs, some libraries. You get to know them when you need to.

Hi, Can anyone recommend a paediatric occupational therapist for a young child at all? Much appreciated.

I would like to obtain childhood medical records from Bromley and Lewisham hospitals but do not know specifically which ones. There is no one to ask to get more information on hospital specifics. All I know is that there was two hospital admittances whislt living in these boroughs. When I look online it seems I would have to apply directly to the specific hospital where treatment happened. Does anyone know if there is a broader place to apply, a centralised place as such?

I'm not saying I disagree with you or I agree with the other poster. Or vice versa. I am saying everyone is entitled to their view and that life is difficult enough without us berating eachother and pulling eachother down. You don't seem to be open to this fact and I'm sure the parents tuning into this thread would much rather it addressed the issues at hand so I am going to stop engaging with you now DulwichLondoner. Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ? Anyone is entitled to say and think the Earth is > flat. This doesn?t make it true. > > Just like someone is entitled to write here that > the Earth is flat, I am entitled to write that it > is unsubstantiated nonsense, and that there has > been irrefutable evidence for ages that it?s not > flat. This is not about debating, say, whether X > or Y would be a better Prime Minister. This is > about scientific truths. > > When someone draws inference from a handful of > isolated an unrepresentative incidents (my > unvaccinated kids are doing just fine) I am > entitled to point out how and why this approach is > wrong. Beg to differ? Great. Then explain why. > > Vaccines are more complex because individual > choices affect the rest of society (herd > immunity), and because a parent?s anti-scientific > approach causes direct harm to helpless children. > Individual rights are not absolute. You have the > right to think that 70mph would be a better speed > limit for urban areas, and are entitled to point > out the merits of your case. You are not entitled > to drive at 70mph in the city centre, not because > you might get hurt (Darwinian selection) but > because you might hurt other people. It?s the same > with vaccines.

This is a forum. The definition of a forum being "A meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged." People are entitled to exchange their views. Whether you value homeopathic views or scientific ones, you don't know what the next person on here values. All points should be made welcome. It's for the reader to then discern what is of value to them. You are entitled to your views but so is everyone else. DulwichLondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This is not about disagreeing, it?s about stating > banal facts. One can think the Earth is flat ? his > thinking it doesn?t make it true. > > There exists such a thing as a scientific truth. > If someone wants to challenge and dispute it, he > should do so applying the scientific method, not > saying ?I think?? or reporting one or two isolated > and totally unrepresentative cases.

I think everyone should be entitled to make their comments on here without being berated because someone disagrees with them. You can get your point across without pulling another person down. We are all parents struggling along and trying to do the best for our kids. We all reach out on this forum for support and advice. We can each give our wildly varying views without criticising others so I think we should choose to be kind rather than clever. DulwichLondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Reading some of the replies here, it seems not > everyone appreciates how utterly irrelevant single > cases are. ?My little Johnny was totally fine with > it? or ?My little Rosie was not? are both equally > meaningless statements. Pros and cons of a given > treatment are not studied by asking a few random > people what their experience has been, but by > conducting thorough epidemiological studies, i.e. > by analysing statistically a sample large enough > to be representative. > > Whatever your opinion, it cannot be based on one > or two unrepresentative cases. > > @TE44, that?s why I don?t know whether to feel > angry or disheartened when I hear statements like > yours , about how your non-vaccinated kids are > doing fine. There are children who were brought up > in households where everyone smoked in front of > them. There were times when car seats were not > used because they didn?t exist or were not > mandatory. There are countries where parents take > 1 or 2 very young children on motorbikes with no > helmet and no protective gear. For each of this > example, and many more, one could come up with > cases of children who did those things and > survived. Yet this doesn?t make these behaviours > acceptable nor safe. > Also, how is the system corrupt? > > On Dr Carolyne Frost, the mere fact that she lists > things like newspaper articles and generic > comments by random people on the internet as her > sources is very worrying. Contrast this with the > American study of over 2 million people quoted by > the Oxford website mentioned above. Not to mention > that homeopathy is not science ? there is no proof > whatsoever for it! > > @Te44, you worry it becomes mandatory to > vaccinate. I very much hope it does, and worry it > is not mandatory at the moment. I am usually quite > libertarian in my approach, and am a big fan of > Darwinian selection. If an adult refuses ordinary > medical treatment in favour of homeopathy or other > voodoo science, well, it?s his choice, and his > choice does not affect the rest of the population > much. With vaccines it?s different, though, > because the choice of not vaccinating does affect > the rest of the population big time. Ever heard > about herd immunity? It means that having a large > % of the population immune to infection (as with > vaccines) protects those who are not immune, e.g. > the very few people who cannot be vaccinated > because of rare medical conditions. Plus, of > course, an adult?s right to make stupid choices > which endanger himself should not apply to > helpless children.

Oh ok. Silly me. Saffron Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lots of people, actually. > > yekanomyeknom Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Also very interesting. Chicken eggs and Pigs > > gelatine!? Who'd have thought! > > > > Saffron Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/nasal-flu-vaccine

Also very interesting. Chicken eggs and Pigs gelatine!? Who'd have thought! Saffron Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/nasal-flu-vaccine