Alan Medic

What are you angry about malumbu? I can't remember where it was the last time it was in South London, though I do remember someone reporting here that the panel were later found eating somewhere in the Dulwich area. Someone will probably find the thread or even remember.

I thought I said I was?

I helped my son make a claim a couple of years ago. I don't remember the specifics but I did it via the EU regulations which covered it. I believe we got the maximum compensation of 5-600 Euros. Look it up. It took a bit of effort but had a satisfying conclusion.

What did you do?

That's a large payoff if he was on ?20k a week. Two year contract? I imagine there's something built into it, if he gets new employers in January. The Burnley manager had nothing but good to say about him. Perhaps they're a bit thin skinned in the blue half of Glasgow.

katanita Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Google Translate app says the heading is > Recording setting and the four options are: > > Image resolution > Auto recording > camera interval > Timestamp I asked my son anyway. Only slight differences were: 1. Same 2. Same 3. Camera Space 4. Diary

If the above won't work let me know. Will send to my son n China

I meant Michigan. She takes that she can just win.

It's not over yet. Wisconsin is one to watch from what I hear.

You forgot the gun lobby KK..........

Well, I haven't waited over 100 years but it seems like it. Well done Ireland for a great win over New Zealand.

Do you mean sing or is this a program for the deaf?

Didn't flog them HMB. They were free to anyone interested enough. My job was done getting a bookstore in Wimbledon to cough up. Have two sets left. Ireland had Wimbledon champions too!

Pure speculation, but what do people think will happen?

Lose HMB, lose.....Wasn't his brother number one in doubles already?

Why do the government have to appeal the decision? Any referendum is advisory not law. If TM doesn't want to delay matters then don't appeal. It's wasting time. I've a bad feeling this country is going to end up very divided.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote: > > In any case, this judgement does not prevent > Brexit from happening. It determines that it > can't happen behind closed doors, with secret > terms that we don't find out about until its too > late. I would have thought the average Leave > voter would be equally happy with this, as > otherwise they could find leaving wasn't what they > thought it would be either. It does not prevent Brexit but you are assuming there will be an open debate in parliament requiring the government to reveal details of what it will involve. As many have said, to do that would be like showing your hand to your opponent in a game of cards. How can that happen? Also the EU has said that negotiations will only begin after Art.50 is triggered. So the question is will the MP's who are mostly saying that the wishes of the people should be honoured, agree to trigger Art.50 with little if no detail? Maybe they will. If they don't agree and the motion is defeated, I can't see anything but a general election happening. As of June the 22nd, MP's were 4 to 1 in favour of remaining according to what I read on the BBC's website.

Now this real multitasking......for men.

Hope you haven't just put a curse on him HMB.One win away isn't quite there. Maybe you're hoping to regain top spot as Sterlingshire's greatest sporting export!

Excellent work Mr.Lush. Looking forward to the Fox's response........

Poppycock. The FA have dropped the FAI in it for having writing on their shirts representing 100 years since the Easter Rising. That's just because FIFA refused to sanction the wearing of the poppy when England play Scotland, as you probably all well know. What pisses me off is that the FIFA rule is a good one and all the home FA's had to do was bloody ignore it. Not ask for permission, not have the PM ranting on about it in parliament, not front page news. Just fecking do it as Ireland obviously did. As a spokesperson at FIFA said, they would probably only do something about it, if there was a complaint. Yeah, like the one Ireland just had about them. Bloody neighbours.

LadyNorwood Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > LadyNorwood Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > AM - who's to say they're not? Are you > talking > > > about the man on the street or those 'in > > charge'? > > > > > > I haven't spoken to the man on the street. So > I'm > > talking about the rest. I wouldn't necessarily > say > > they are in charge. As the PM hasn't negotiated > > Brexit thusfar, who are the people in the know > you > > think exist? > > > Who is the rest? You make very sweeping > generalisations - unless you are prepared to speak > to each and every person who voted then how can > you know? To cut to the chase, who are the informed people out there? I don't see them. Enlighten me.

Dont think either of those are stranger than them winning the CL and being relegated.

LadyNorwood Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > AM - who's to say they're not? Are you talking > about the man on the street or those 'in charge'? I haven't spoken to the man on the street. So I'm talking about the rest. I wouldn't necessarily say they are in charge. As the PM hasn't negotiated Brexit thusfar, who are the people in the know you think exist?

LadyNorwood Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > red devil Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Perhaps they will now take the case to the > > > European Court of Justice... :) > > > > Quote of the week I think! > > > > This attitude of 'we must enforce the will of > the > > people' gets on my ties. MP's are elected by > the > > will of the people on the basis they know > better > > than we do (possibly). A referendum which > produced > > a result almost too close to call where many > votes > > were very likely based on believing lies, is > not > > the right way to decide the future of the > country. > > Let the MP's debate on the actual merits or > > otherwise of Brexit and then vote on it. > > I'm not sure that would work either, given that > most MPs were either firmly Remain or firmly > Leave. I think to say "many votes were very > likely based on believing lies" is being rather > disingenuous; many people I know felt patronised > by the elite and made very informed choices (on > both sides of the debate).... If so many people were well informed then, how come nobody appears to be now?