I have been avoiding this tread as I posted it in my "too worthy" box and thought it would be full of the usual class based rock throwing and psuedo-intellectual old wank. Having nothing better to do, I have scanned through the past 4 pages and I was correct in my assumption. How do you know ED is less diverse? It seems to be based on "My neighbours have changed colour" or "there are more cheese shops on the Lane" or "its not like it was in the good old days". To describe this as "ethnic cleansing" or "genocide" is at best crass and at worst shows a breath taking ignorance of history that you should be ashamed of. We are talking about the natural population churn of an insignificant suburb of South London NOT the mass slaughter, raping and maiming of whole populations. Dulwich Park is not the killing fields, Peckham Rye is not the site of a concentration camp. ED is diverse, as diverse as any other part of London. What that diversity looks like changes year by year as the demographics of the city change; and of course you cannot measure diversity by what it "looks" like. Your new Polish neighbours are just as diverse as the West Indian neighbours that used to live there. ED is currently quite affluent, a few years ago it wasnt, at some time in the future it might be on its arse again. For some perspective reas Peter Akroyds "London the Biography" - it describes how the woes of London's chattering classes are the same now as they have been for many hundreds of years - the weather, the drains, immigration, lawlessness, London dirt, traffic, noise, the plague and drunkeness. Well, perhaps the plague isnt a big issue at the moment...