In her latest blog entry CWALD observed "Anyone who knows me, knows I've been around the block a few times, so have lots to say about men and sex. But something that has been bothering me a lot recently is the good in bed = broke and well flushed = crap in bed phenomenon. Why is it that most guys who are amazing in bed are usually broke, and the ones who are doing well in life are usually a lousy lay?" This kind of chimes with a piece I heard recently on the radio which said that men who were married had a lower testosterone count than otherwise similar single men and that men with a number of wives (at the same time) had an even lower levels of testoserone. This was put down to a primordial need to find a mate and thus testosterone is produced to stimulate mating behaviour, getting pissed on a Saturday night, having a fight and throwing up in the gutter for instance. If that need is satisfied and man has his mate the requirement for testosterone reduces and if there are a number of mates, it is reduced even more. Taking CWALD's point, striving for life success is part of broader mating behaviour, if a man has money and posessions then he does not need to make that much of an effort; if he does not have those obvious signals of success he needs to make more of an effort. So, ladies and gentlemen but not children, what say you?