I have three boys and no car. My local choices are Charter (unlikely to be close enough for their catchment) and Harris Boys. As I wish them to have a co-educational education I have no local choice and further afield will mainly be penalised because of catchment. The yr3 kids Mrs Lotte talks about will be looking for places in 3yrs - that's not long if we suddenly find a dearth of local secondary places. I think in the past you have suggested that the wealth of single sex girls schools locally means that we need to balance up with single sex ones for the boys which doesn't offer a proper co-educational choice and, in my opinion, penalises boys in particular, as research shows they do better in co-eds whereas girls do better in single sex schools. I would be really grateful if you could clarify the figures, demand and strategy for local secondary provision. I fear it is a ticking bomb being ignored and I cannot support the use of valuable land/capital for primary places when they will have nowhere to go to six later.