Well there's probably more in it than homeopathy, but here you go: A study by two science professors at the University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine http://faculty.une.edu/com/shartman/sram.pdf Key quotes: "There is little science in any aspect of cranial osteopathy" and "We conclude that cranial osteopathy should be removed from curricula of colleges of osteopathic medicine and from osteopathic licensing examinations" A more blistering and readable assault from Hartman is here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564028/ Key Quote: "This treatment regime lacks a biologically plausible mechanism, shows no diagnostic reliability, and offers little hope that any direct clinical effect will ever be shown. In spite of almost uniformly negative research findings, "cranial" methods remain popular with many practitioners and patients" Finally, if you're still awake, there's a very full discussion of the evidence on cranial here (and criticism from within the Osteopathic world): http://skepticbarista.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/osteopathya-question-of-evidence-part-1/ Key quote: "I certainly do not think that it can be accepted that Cranial Osteopathy is effective in the treatment of any condition" Is that alright f'yuz?