Tony.London Suburbs

bigbadwolf Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's been a while Tony, good to see you're still > with us. I've created a thread called 'Our' song > and included you in it. Did I get it right? Well I admit that Song is one of my 2,500 Singles ( that I rarely play now):) My next door neighbour was a Dustman, when I lived in my last Council Flat, working for Southwark Council. If he didn't finish his 1.0'clock shift and be home by 9.00AM he felt well hard done by(!)

Four of my Favourite Posters, Mick Mac, RosieH, Mikecg, bigbadwolf all recently contributing on a thread in honour of one of EDF's finest, Sir Mott Honaloochie. Now THIS is my kind of thread. Oh! plus the added bonus of another hilarious interjection from Moos. What more could anyone wish for, on here? :)-D

(tu)

RosieH Wrote: Haha, brilliant, really? ... I've known many respected, intelligent Forumites be misunderstood on various Fora over the years, as some comments can be intrepreted in more than one way. As you know it happens in life too when someone tells someone "they were only joking" ..other times they make it clear they were not joking at all.

Thank You for your contributions Guys but I'll await the response from Moos all the same.

???? Wrote: unfortunately Mick, as to back both teams at 1.7, a shade better than 4/6 and 1.4 ( exactly 2/5 Tony, not all true - ?200 on Rangers would reduce losses for certain to ?120.. or ?60 if Celtic won surely? I'll be really quick ???? as I've got to go and meet someone but ?200 on Rangers would restrict a Rangers loss to ?120 as you said but Celtic only Won ?140 in the first place and now putting ?200 on Rangers means Celtic lose him ?60 ( ?140+ - ?200) so he would lose ?120 on Rangers and now ?60 on Celtic...

Ted Max Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well, either it was a joke Tony, or Moos actually > thinks you are a sadist with a collection of human > house pets. > > I'm going for B. > > It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the > hose again. Your contributions are always welcome Ted Max but, we both know, Moos is more than capable of speaking up for herself, I'll await her response. Obviously, regular users of Internet fora are aware of ambiguities and misunderstandings that can arise when a comment is made so they, often, use symbols to avoid the chance of that occurring, but as this has not happened this time, I agree it does appear an "either/or" situation as you suggest, which is why I would like some clarification from the authoress of said remark.

The latter part of what ???? said could be an option if they allow in-running on the 2 games ( which I assume are the last game each and are played simultaneously). Although, sometimes, you can do "damage limitation" this, apart from the situation changing in-running, is not one of them, unfortunately Mick, as to back both teams at 1.7 ( a shade better than 4/6 ) and 1.4 ( exactly 2/5 ) can only lead someone to the poor house. So: Option 1: Sit on it and pray! Option 2: Trade in-running if you are able to and the situation changes in your favour)...

Moos Wrote: I always suspected you might be the kind of person that keeps people in cages, TLS. Can you explain what you mean by that comment, please Moos.

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sounds OK TLS, what's the pension like? Any > meducal insurance? With you around as my permanent Buddy, I won't need either of these! I'll live to be 130>:D<

Mikecg Wrote: As ever I don't have a clue what the hell you are on about?. *Stares into space vacantly wondering WTF* Hona is an acquired taste. Would you like to acquire him? p.s. Personally I would like to keep him as a pet, in a cage naturally, feed him, buy him new sandals or a new dufflecoat occassionally, and, in return, for his bed, board and cage he would entertain me all day with his amusing anecdotes, vivid vignettes and fabulously fertile imagination.:)

The Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) system is to be fitted in a London bus and taxi, as well as 20 vehicles driven by TfL staff, from this summer. If it proves successful it is to be rolled out more widely, with Southwark Council having already expressed an interest in fitting the device in more than 300 vehicles, this will force other Motorists behind them to also, obey the limit.. You can choose which "mode" the car operates in but I think we know which "mode" will be TOLD to use! lol "Force" other drivers..."OBEY" the limit...so Guys as you are not capable yourselves Big Brother Southwark will force you to do it their way...and anyway its the law, which no Southwark Council employee, inthe relevant Dept, NEVER breaks in any way.....i.e. NEVER buy "Black Market" Goods. never "Jay-Walk" . ALWAYS use Pedestrian crossings..NEVER Download stuff that should be paid for etc...thats "different" Laws, innit... Anyway off to The South Downs in half-hour, far away from the MADding crowd of Southwark enforcers...:))

Beachy Head awaits Looch. If I don't come back then, please, make arrangements for the continuation of this fine thread.

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Tone... sweetheart... I was indeed working in the powers of corridors yesterday. I'm referring to a much higher power than those in the political world - Blimey O'Reilly! Say no more...(winky face) I assume you think that's my field of chosen profession - politics... HAHAHAHAHA certainly not! Not only am I offended by such> assumption .......I said "near" didn't fink you were one of 'em Babe! I am also further offended by the rest of the above comments. Do you not know wot sarcasm is? Course I do(!) Sumfink to do with Deja Vu, innit(!) Silly! > > Moving on, my opinion now is that at least 213 and > 3/4s should now depart, especially that dude that > jumps the lights on his bike ::)) As long as my M8 Clive Efford gets in, again. (he's got a mortgage to pay and he's honest as the days long)...honest KK! Rest of 'em need a good poke up the posteria...B)

John Otway: Look out baby Look out Pet Here's the kid Who's gonna get the Blues When you go away I'm on fire Cause I'm in love With a girl who's not the girl she was When I was out with her I saw you in the garden minute You looked so debonair Beware of the flowers Because I'm sure they're gonna get you Yeah!

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Recovered? Yes Ma'am! cos while you were "busy" earning an honest crust near the corridors of power yesterday, I took the time and trouble to speak to every single person in the World ( apart from John Stapleton and Basil D'Oliviera, who could not be contacted) and every last one of them realised that I was jesting/japing (?)/joking about the return about BBW apart from one person...can yer guess who? (points finger very straight and true at KK)..B)

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Some have practical minds tone *rolls eyes* Listen my Lass (adopts stern demeanour) there's been a bit toooo much "rollin' eyes" "shrugging" and "sighing" in these 'ere parts and It brings me no pleasure in saying that YOU are the chief culprit (fidgets, nervously, while awaiting a riposte from KK)..

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Could you walk in those Annas? You live and learn! I never realised that was a factor in why Wimmin buy certain shoes??

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not quite how I'd describe it... *shrugs* Morning KK! Recovered:))????

The problem was that Clubs that got involved in "naughty" things in Europe dragged down the good names of Teams like Leeds, West Ham, Cardiff and Millwall who might have been able to play in European competition....

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Tony.London Suburbs Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Seemed like an individual who would not sit on > the > > fence, had individual thoughts and said > individual > > things. > > > > Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon > like > > that on The Good Ship EDF! > > > > No of course not eh tone just everyone who thinks, > speaks and dare I say it LOOKS the same aint that > right! ::o How boring that would be! I trust you have revised your opinion after some reflection, about our maverick BBW? We need order on here KK...

Mark Wrote: Reverted to using others work and passing it off as your own again Tony? Haven't you heard of "co-incidence" Mark? There are an incredible number of "co-incidences" in Society generally. p.s. I know you could not possibly thought that I could have wriitten that, so it was expected that someone was going to check that wordage. I was wrong though as you were my 7/2 Joint Second Favourite...:))

bigbadwolf Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Happy Bi-centenary and a bit Tony. I'm NOT 200+ you silly old bustard...:))

Oi! How 'bout wishing me "Happy Birthday" for the other day?? Everyone did (apart from Sean:( )

Welcome Back My Son and Behave yerself, yer wee scallywag...>:D