Ladymuck

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking > qualification Sean, we are definitely not on the same wave-length (or planet even?)...my comment was in response to: ???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >...just a > different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than > the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out > by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their > families away from any school that became 'too > diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent > darling?". Anyway, I'm not so impressed with him now that he banked that "100" again...the sly puss...;-) *sulks*

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > but seeing as he basically withdrew it 2 minutes > later Ladymuck, does it still count? Can't see that he withdrew it...nope...I've looked... (are we looking at the same stuff:-S?)

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > but seeing as he basically withdrew it 2 minutes > later Ladymuck, does it still count? Can't see that he withdrew it...nope...I've looked... (are we looking at the same stuff:-S?)

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >...just a > different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than > the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out > by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their > families away from any school that became 'too > diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent > darling?". Wow ????! That was brave...well done you! *sees ???? in a different light* You too Michael Palaeologus...err sorry I meant Chief Bhuna...I can't argue with you...logical stuff

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >...just a > different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than > the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out > by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their > families away from any school that became 'too > diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent > darling?". Wow ????! That was brave...well done you! *sees ???? in a different light* You too Michael Palaeologus...err sorry I meant Chief Bhuna...I can't argue with you...logical stuff

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: >geez lady muck, how spelt out must it be... sorry...brain the size of a pea... Jah Lush Wrote: >Ian Hunter is HB's hero. So it was HB. Hope that's got you out of suspenders Ladymuck. Thank you Jah Lush...you are a gent...err suspenders?... And as for you HB...hmmmmph..."Maam" is not amused...especially as this means I lost the bet... *attempts to look "not amused" but giggles instead*

verds Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anyone know when the Christmas lights go up on the > Lane? Are we going to have lights then? How exciting! In which case, Monica could dress up as the Queen and switch them on...she could arrive seated side-saddled on Doris the Donkey...

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ian Hunter - ooh you little tease HB! ...now my brain has gone into meltdown...what is everyone on about? And HB: you are a tease...a big fat one...now be a sport will you before I... (*waves fist in air towards HB*)

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Despite all that's been said that's bad about BBW, > and many people have said negative things about > him, I think he gave me more laughs than anyone > else. I feel exactly the same, Mick Mac. > > It seems he offended too many people. Sadly it does, though he didn't offend me...on the contrary...

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If I was to say anagram? So you do know...now stop being tantalising HB you wicked person and put me out of my misery...or at least give me another clue (one which my brain can cope with)! (*looks at HB with pleading eyes*).

Yes, I do too - especially those from our Wild Endangered Specie.

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I wonder if there could possibly be a clue in the > name? Sorry HB...I suspect I'm being a bit thick here...do you know anything? Care to divulge? Oh...be a sport....*nudges HB*...(please?)

Iaineasy, you forgot to give Fidgetsmum that much needed hug. *winks cheekily at Fidgetsmum*

Brendan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think that if you are classed as being at risk > you would be mad not to get it. I agree with Brendan. But even then, I would ask to view the (apparently very long) list of "side effects" in order to weigh up the risks properly and make a truly informed decision.

Did anyone ever find out who "Hair n Tune" was? Another forumite thought it might be you HB, I thought it might be ????...in fact we had a bet on it. Anyone going to own up?

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Or was it BBW arsing about again? > Either way still Josephines. I can actually vouch for our wild endangered specie...on this occasion he was impeccably behaved (though I am judging his behaviour by my own standards of course!).

Oh you poor thing...hope you are alright...but thank you for those useful descriptions (bastards).

I agree with merylou... To be frank, we haven't noticed a lot of difference between the service pre-strike and now...it has been poor for the last couple of years...the only difference now is that we do not use the post unless absolutely necessary (e.g. tax returns now filed on line...phone calls instead of birthday cards etc.) And as for contacting their so-called Customer Services at HO...save yourself the headache...a complete waste of time.

(*fresh out of re-hab*) I hope you all had the best break ever (so you never ever have to take one again). *grins cheekily* Oh, and thanks for returning ahead of time xxxxxxx

monica Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ladymuck do you mean your Primark specials > love:)-D Blimey...you been peeping through the keyhole? (*shoves a bit of gum in keyhole*).

AU REVOIR TA TA AUF WEIDERSHEN ADIOS GUTEN NACHT BONNE NUIT HASTA LUEGO ADIEU

emc, not long now...hope you've had lots of PMs re. a decent man...they do exist you know...I'm absolutely certain that in 2 weeks' time you'll be telling us you've met someone - you HAVE to...you really are quite beautiful (and, no - I'm definitely not a lesbian either). All the best to you...looking forward to hearing some good news in 2 weeks.

karter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Me > finks that the last poster will be that insomniac, > Ladymuck. I think I might just have to disappoint you all...midnight is a little early for me...but, should I manage it (amongst the scramble), I promise to keep it clean, smut, and innuendo free - just this once!

Indeed Mark (and team), have a super break, get thoroughly refreshed and return full of vigour. You will be missed.

Asset Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > OOOh I saw my name on there, I'm famous too!!!! Yes, I saw your name too...along with Nancysmum's, fractionater's, TJ's, and goblinqueen's...ooh such fun. Do you think that Hoopers... *pauses to adjust "white tea cosy" and pose for the paparazzi* ...sorry, as I was saying...do you think that Hoopers will have the red carpet ready in time for the next EDF drinks?! Bye the way, nearly pissed my knickers laughing over your comments PeckhamRose, Scoop, monica and HAL9000.